In my code below, I don't like that I have the List<EmailDraft>
list defined outside of the stream. I'm pretty sure there is a way to have the stream processing return a List<EmailDraft>
list directly, I'm just not sure how to do this. Thoughts?
List<EmailDraft> drafts /* <-- don't like this */
= new LinkedList<>();
List<SyndFeed> feeds
= evnt.getFeeds();
feeds.stream().forEach(
sf -> sf.getEntries().stream().forEach(se -> {
EmailDraft ed = new EmailDraft();
// Title
ed.setTitle(sf.getTitle());
// ....
// Add to list
drafts.add(ed); /* <-- don't like this either */
})
);
You can use flatMap
on the feeds and collect
all the EmailDrafts in a list as following:
List<EmailDraft> emailDrafts =
feeds.stream()
.flatMap(
sf -> sf.getEntries().stream().map(se -> {
EmailDraft ed = new EmailDraft();
// Title
ed.setTitle(sf.getTitle());
return ed;
})
).collect(Collectors.toList());
Use map
feeds.stream().flatmap(
sf -> sf.getEntries().stream()).map(se -> {
EmailDraft ed = new EmailDraft();
// Title
ed.setTitle(sf.getTitle());
// ....
return ed;
})
);
Another alternative using range to create stream of title
repeated for the number of elements in sf.getEntries()
:
List<EmailDraft> drafts = feeds.stream()
.flatMap( sf -> IntStream.range( 0, sf.getEntries().size() ).mapToObj( i -> sf.getTitle() ) )
.map( t -> {
EmailDraft ed = new EmailDraft();
ed.setTitle(t);
return ed;
}
)
.collect( Collectors.toList() );
Instead of overcomplicating things and doing everything with streams, you just could do it the old pre Java-8 way:
List<EmailDraft> drafts = new ArrayList<>();
for(SyndFeed sf : feeds){
for(int i = sf.getEntries().size(); i > 0; i--){
EmailDraft ed = new EmailDraft();
ed.setTitle(sf.getTitle());
drafts.add(ed);
}
}
which IMO should be preferred because it is such a simple task.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.