Express XOR in SKI combinators

Question

I am trying to solve sure but can you SKI on codewars. It is about to express lambda in SKI combinators. Source is at https://repl.it/@delta4d/SKI .

After some researching, especially the Combinatory Logic , I am able to solve all the cases except xor .

I first translates xor into

xor x y = if y 
          then if x
               then false
               else true
          else x

which is

xor = \x y -> y (x false true) x
-- false = K I
-- true = K

applying lambda to SKI rules, I got

\x.\y.y (x false true) x
\x.S (\y.y (x false true)) (K x)
\x.S (S I (K (x false true))) (K x)
S (\x.S (S I (K (x false true)))) K
S (S (K S) (\x.S I (K (x false true)))) K
S (S (K S) (S (K (S I)) (\x.K (x false true)))) K
S (S (K S) (S (K (S I)) (S (K K) (\x.x false true)))) K
S (S (K S) (S (K (S I)) (S (K K) (S (\x.x false) (K true))))) K
S (S (K S) (S (K (S I)) (S (K K) (S (S I (K false)) (K true))))) K

I have checked the SKI presentation on http://ski.aditsu.net , it works fine.

Haskell sources compiles, but got runtime error.

Codewars reports:

 Couldn't match type `a' with `Bool' a' `a' is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: a -> a -> a at Kata.hs:66:9 Expected type: SKI (Bool' a -> (Bool' a -> Bool' a -> Bool' a) -> a -> a -> a) Actual type: SKI (Bool' (Bool' a)) In the second argument of `xorF', namely `true' In the second argument of `($)', namely `xorF true true' 

I have test on local with prettyPrintSKI $ Ap (Ap xor' false) true , and it reports:

 • Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a20 ~ Bool' a20 Expected type: SKI (Bool' a20 -> (Bool' a20 -> Bool' a20 -> Bool' a20) -> Bool' a20) Actual type: SKI (Bool' (Bool' a20)) • In the second argument of 'Ap', namely 'true' In the second argument of '($)', namely 'Ap (Ap xor' false) true' In the expression: prettyPrintSKI $ Ap (Ap xor' false) true 

What is the infinite type about? what is the rigid type?

I am doing the same thing on or as or = \\xy -> x true y , and it works just fine.

---

1. https://www.codewars.com/kata/sure-but-can-you-ski-i
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatory_logic
3. http://ski.aditsu.net

Answer 1

The problem comes from the double use of x in λxy.y (x false true) x . It's forced to have two types simultaneously. Since y uses x , y must return something of let's say type a . Now this means that x false true is also of type a . So something of type a must be (b -> b -> a) (for some b ). But that's impossible, since that means a must contain itself.

It's worth noting that your solution is correct wrt. SK, just not Haskell's type system. So to fix we need to not use x twice with different types. So why not make them the same type with λxy.y(x false true)(x true false) ?