I'm working on this homework that's kind of confusing me...
I am provided with the following BinarySearchTree class
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
/**
*
* @param <T> The type of data stored in the nodes of the tree, must implement Comparable<T> with the compareTo method.
*/
public class BinarySearchTree<T extends Comparable<T>> {
BinaryTree<T> tree;
int size;
public BinarySearchTree() {
tree = new BinaryTree<T>();
size = 0;
}
public boolean isEmpty() {
return tree.isEmpty();
}
protected BinaryTree<T> recursiveSearch(BinaryTree<T> root, T key) {
if (root == null) {
return null;
}
int c = key.compareTo(root.data);
if (c == 0) {
return root;
}
if (c < 0) {
return recursiveSearch(root.left, key);
} else {
return recursiveSearch(root.right, key);
}
}
public T search(T key) {
if (tree.isEmpty()) {
return null;
}
return recursiveSearch(tree, key).data;
}
public void insert(T item) {
if (tree.isEmpty()) { // insert here
tree.makeRoot(item);
size++;
return;
}
// do an iterative descent
BinaryTree<T> root = tree;
boolean done=false;
BinaryTree<T> newNode = null;
while (!done) {
int c = item.compareTo(root.data);
if (c == 0) { // duplicate found, cannot be inserted
throw new OrderViolationException();
}
if (c < 0) { // insert in left subtree
if (root.left == null) { // insert here as left child
newNode = new BinaryTree<T>();
root.left = newNode;
done=true;
} else { // go further down left subtree
root = root.left;
}
} else { // insert in right subtree
if (root.right == null) { // insert here as right child
newNode = new BinaryTree<T>();
root.right = newNode;
done=true;
} else { // go further down right subtree
root = root.right;
}
}
}
// set fields of new node
newNode.data = item;
newNode.parent = root;
size++;
}
/**
* @param deleteNode Node whose parent will receive new node as right or left child,
* depending on whether this node is its parent's right or left child.
* @param attach The node to be attached to parent of deleteNode.
*/
protected void deleteHere(BinaryTree<T> deleteNode, BinaryTree<T> attach) {
// deleteNode has only one subtree, attach
BinaryTree<T> parent = deleteNode.parent;
deleteNode.clear(); // clear the fields
if (parent == null) {
return;
}
if (deleteNode == parent.left) {
// left child of parent, attach as left subtree
parent.detachLeft();
parent.attachLeft(attach);
return;
}
// attach as right subtree
parent.detachRight();
parent.attachRight(attach);
}
protected BinaryTree<T> findPredecessor(BinaryTree<T> node) {
if (node.left == null) {
return null;
}
BinaryTree<T> pred = node.left; // turn left once
while (pred.right != null) { // keep turning right
pred = pred.right;
}
return pred;
}
public T delete(T key) {
if (tree.isEmpty()) { // can't delete from an empty tree
throw new NoSuchElementException();
}
// find node containing key
BinaryTree<T> deleteNode = recursiveSearch(tree, key);
if (deleteNode == null) { // data not found, can't delete
throw new NoSuchElementException();
}
BinaryTree<T> hold;
// case c: deleteNode has exactly two subtrees
if (deleteNode.right != null && deleteNode.left != null) {
hold = findPredecessor(deleteNode);
deleteNode.data = hold.data;
deleteNode = hold; // fall through to case a or b
}
// case a: deleteNode is a leaf
if (deleteNode.left == null && deleteNode.right == null) {
deleteHere(deleteNode, null);
size--;
return deleteNode.data;
}
// case b: deleteNode has exactly one subtree
if (deleteNode.right != null) {
hold = deleteNode.right;
deleteNode.right = null;
} else {
hold = deleteNode.left;
deleteNode.left = null;
}
deleteHere(deleteNode,hold);
if (tree == deleteNode) { // root deleted
tree = hold;
}
size--;
return deleteNode.data;
}
public T minKey() {
if (tree.data == null) { // tree empty, can't find min value
throw new NoSuchElementException();
}
BinaryTree<T> root = tree;
T min=root.data;
root = root.left; // turn left once
while (root != null) { // keep going left to leftmost node
min = root.data;
root = root.left;
}
return min;
}
public T maxKey() {
if (tree.getData() == null) { // tree empty, can't find max value
throw new NoSuchElementException();
}
BinaryTree<T> root=tree;
T max=root.data;
root = root.right; // turn right once
while (root != null) { // keep going to rightmost node
max = root.data;
root = root.right;
}
return max;
}
public int size() {
return size;
}
protected void recursivePreOrder(BinaryTree<T> root, Visitor<T> visitor) {
if (root != null) {
visitor.visit(root);
recursivePreOrder(root.left, visitor);
recursivePreOrder(root.right, visitor);
}
}
public void preOrder(Visitor<T> visitor) {
if (tree.isEmpty()) {
return;
}
recursivePreOrder(tree, visitor);
}
protected void recursiveInOrder(BinaryTree<T> root, Visitor<T> visitor) {
if (root != null) {
recursiveInOrder(root.left, visitor);
visitor.visit(root);
recursiveInOrder(root.right, visitor);
}
}
public void inOrder(Visitor<T> visitor) {
if (tree.isEmpty()) {
return;
}
recursiveInOrder(tree, visitor);
}
protected void recursivePostOrder(BinaryTree<T> root, Visitor<T> visitor) {
if (root != null) {
recursivePostOrder(root.left, visitor);
recursivePostOrder(root.right, visitor);
visitor.visit(root);
}
}
public void postOrder(Visitor<T> visitor) {
if (tree.isEmpty()) {
return;
}
recursivePostOrder(tree, visitor);
}
}
================================================================================
Now I have another class Student.... I want to create a binary search tree of Student objects..
BinarySearchTree<Student> tree = new BinarySearchTree<Student>();
However when I do that I get the following error:
Bound mismatch: The type Student is not a valid substitute for the bounded parameter > of the type BinarySearchTree
Any ideas what's happening here... I can't figure it out.
public class BinarySearchTree<T extends Comparable<T>>
A formal generics argument, in your case T, lists what's required for a class to be a valid T. In you case, you've said, "to be a valid T, a class must implement Comparable" (The keyword is "extends", but in practice that means "extends or implements".)
In your instantiation, T is Student. If we substitute Student for T:
public class BinarySearchTree<Student extends Comparable<Student>>
is that a true statement? Does Student really implement Comparable?
If it does, Student fits the requirement of being a T, and so you can use Student as the actual parameter for the formal parameter T.
If not, you get the compiler's complaint you saw.
Actually, to cover more complicated situations where a subclass's implementation of Comparable is done by a super class, the more general form would be:
public class BinarySearchTree<T extends Comparable<? super T > >
So you need to make Student implement Comparable< Student >.
Note that I didn't say that the compiler's looking for a Student.compareTo
. It doesn't even get that far. It's looking to see if T (in your case, Student) is declared as implementing Comparable< T> (in your case, Comparable< Student >).
Now adding implements Comparable< Student >
to Student will also make the compiler ensure that there's a public int compareTo
method on Student. But without the "implements Comparable", even if the compiler knows there's a method Student.compareTo
, it doesn't know that that compareTo
is the Comparable.compareTo
.
(In other words, we're looking for declared implementation, not just that there happens to be a method with the right name and signature.)
班级学生是否实施可比性?
but I'm not quite sure how to implement the compareTo method.
Basically it's something like the following. How the ordering works you have to decide.
class Student implements Comparable<Student> {
//...
int compareTo(Student other) {
// return some negative number if this object is less than other
// return 0 if this object is equal to other
// return some positive number if this object is greater than other
}
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.