Suppose I have this bit of code:
Map<Consumer, Item> map = myStream.parallel()
.filter(Objects::nonNull)
.collect(Collectors.toConcurrentMap(e->e,
e->e, mergeFunction));
What I want to do is call a method on each object of the stream after collecting is done.
For example,
item.setDate(item.getOneDate());
Before the code done sequentially looped through items, put into a map, and at the very end called a bit of the code like the one above, setting a 'date'.
while(iterator.hasNext()) {
Item blah = iterator.next();
....
// code for putting into map
...
blah.setDate(blah.getOneDate());
}
Not sure how to do this with Java 8 streams. forEach
? peek
?
if this must be done after the collect
operation, just use forEach
:
map.forEach((k, v) -> {...});
if you're only interested in values:
map.values().forEach(item -> {...});
or only keys:
map.keySet().forEach(item -> {...});
This will be controversial , but I would use peek()
:
myStream.parallel()
.filter(Objects::nonNull)
.peek(item -> item.setDate(item.getOneDate()))
IMO, this use case invalidates many of the arguments against using peek()
for state modification, since it's essentially side-effect free (assuming elements are no longer accessible from the stream source). It definitely complies with the only strict requirement of non-interference .
I would agree with Jigar Joshi . A map
operation is cleaner. And if you have no need for an intermediate object, just return the same one:
myStream.parallelStream()
.map(i -> { i.setDate(i.getOneDate()); return i; })
...
That said, I would avoid mutating objects in the middle of a Stream
. It's bad practice.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.