Question : why is Specflow using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestClassAttribute() to generate the *.cs code behind for the feature files instead of the NUnit.Framework? Both solutions described below use the same NuGet packages from what I can see.
Details :
I have one project that generates the Specflow codebehind *.cs files and only uses NUnit.
There is a second project (in a separate solution) which always uses "Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestClassAttribute()" instead of using the NUnit Fromework.
I did a search in the second solution for the words "VisualStudio.TestTools" and the only place it showed up was in the TechTalk.SpecFlow.Reporting.dll.
Question : why is Specflow using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestClassAttribute() to generate the *.cs code behind for the feature files instead of the NUnit.Framework? Both solutions use the same NuGet packages from what I can see.
In Specflow 2.3.2 you need to have this "unitTestProvider" in your App.config. But yeah you should probably just upgrade to 3.0
<specFlow>
<plugins>
<add name="SpecRun" />
<!--<add name="SpecFlow.Retry" path="..\packages\SpecFlow.Retry.2.4.0\lib\net45" type="Generator" />-->
</plugins>
<!-- For additional details on SpecFlow configuration options see http://go.specflow.org/doc-config -->
<!-- use unit test provider SpecRun+NUnit or SpecRun+MsTest for being able to execute the tests with SpecRun and another provider -->
<unitTestProvider name="SpecRun+NUnit" />
</specFlow>
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.