简体   繁体   中英

Why didn't `accumulate` make it into Ranges for C++20?

I suspect that accumulate isn't the only algorithm that didn't make it.

Maybe now there's a better way to perform accumulation (folding) over a range and therefore the accumulate is obsolete?

No, accumulate is a perfectly reasonable algorithm, and it's not made obsolete by any other algorithm. The reason for it not being included in c++20 is simply a matter of time. It was considered better to add as much as possible with regards to ranges, without worrying about adding everything at once. Otherwise, there was a risk that none of the constrained algorithms would have made it to c++20, which would have been a shame.

There are still a few algorithms that haven't been constrained yet, as well as the entirety of the <numeric> , and <memory> headers.

Forunately, there is a proposal to add these remaining algorithms (and I'm optimistic that these will be added in c++23). In fact, the introduction to this proposal answers your question nicely:

“Every time someone asks why we didn't cover <numeric> and <memory> algorithms: We thought 187 pages of TS was enough.” — Casey Carter

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM