Confluent Kafka producer message format for nested records

Question

I have a AVRO schema registered in a kafka topic and am trying to send data to it. The schema has nested records and I'm not sure how I correctly send data to it using confluent_kafka python.

Example schema: *ingore any typos in schema (real one is very large, just an example)

 {
 "namespace": "company__name",
 "name": "our_data",
 "type": "record",
 "fields": [
           {
            "name": "datatype1",
            "type": ["null", {
                 "type": "record",
                 "name": "datatype1_1",
                 "fields": [ 
                     {"name": "site", "type": "string"},
                     {"name": "units", "type": "string"}
                  ]
             }]
             "default": null
            }
            {
            "name": "datatype2",
            "type": ["null", {
                 "type": "record",
                 "name": "datatype2_1",
                 "fields": [ 
                     {"name": "site", "type": "string"},
                     {"name": "units", "type": "string"}
                  ]
             }]
             "default": null
            }
           ]
          }

I am trying to send data to this schema using confluent_kafka python version. When I have done this prior, the records were not nested and I would use a typical dictionary key: value pairs and serialize it. How can I send nested data to work with schema.

What I tried so far...

message = {'datatype1': 
            {'site': 'sitename',
             'units': 'm'
            }
           }

this version does not cause any kafka errors, but the all of the columns show up as null

and...

message = {'datatype1': 
            {'datatype1_1':
              {'site': 'sitename',
               'units': 'm'
              }
            }
           }

This version produced a kafka error with the schema.

Answer 1

If you use namespaces, you don't have to worry about naming collisions and you can properly structure your optional records: for example, both

{
  "meta": {
    "instanceID": "something"
  }
}

And

{}

are valid instances of:

{
  "doc": "Survey",
  "name": "Survey",
  "type": "record",
  "fields": [
    {
      "name": "meta",
      "type": [
        "null",
        {
          "name": "meta",
          "type": "record",
          "fields": [
            {
              "name": "instanceID",
              "type": [
                "null",
                "string"
              ],
              "namespace": "Survey.meta"
            }
          ],
          "namespace": "Survey"
        }
      ],
      "namespace": "Survey"
    }
  ]
}