I have a generic class of NameMap() (showing code of interest)
public class NameMap<T1, T2>
{
private Dictionary<T1, T2> _forward = new Dictionary<T1, T2>();
private Dictionary<T2, T1> _backward = new Dictionary<T2, T1>();
public void addBidirectional(T1 modelName, T2 bussinessName)
{
_forward.Add(modelName, bussinessName);
_backward.Add(bussinessName, modelName);
}
The nameMap should be initiated with values as it is created eg (Blue,red) for the forward and (red, blue) for the backward dictionary.
I want to have a setup function within this class eg:
public void setUpBusinessNames()
{
this.addBidirectional(("blue", "red");
}
However, as the class is generic the strings conflict with the generic types.
I've though some ways of solving this:
Anyone got a good way to do this?
You could try this way:
public void setUpBusinessNames()
{
(this as NameMap<string,string>).addBidirectional("blue", "red");
}
But this object must be an instance of NameMap<string, string>
.
make the generic class as abstract
and then create another class which inherits it like this :
public abstract class NameMap<T1, T2>
{
private Dictionary<T1, T2> _forward = new Dictionary<T1, T2>();
private Dictionary<T2, T1> _backward = new Dictionary<T2, T1>();
public void Add(T1 modelName, T2 bussinessName)
{
_forward.Add(modelName, bussinessName);
_backward.Add(bussinessName, modelName);
}
public abstract void SetUp();
}
public class NameMapString : NameMap<string, string>
{
public NameMapString () : base() { }
public override void SetUp()
{
Add("blue", "red");
}
}
this would enforce the type. If you need another type, just create another class and do the same procedure.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.