ASP.Net 3.5/4.0 CodeBehind or CodeFile?
Question
I read through the previous post: CodeFile vs CodeBehind , but I'm still confused on which I should use. It sounds like CodeFile is the newer option that should be used, yet VS2010 generates CodeBehind when creating a new Web Form.
1 answers
solution1
2 ACCPTED 2010-04-06 15:38:24
It depends on your template, check out web site vs. web application. I tend to prefer web application for several reasons, but that is up to you. If you see code-behind, you probably have selected that template.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.
Related Question
ASP.NET CodeFile, CodeBehind and Inherits
Difference between ASP.Net 3.5 and 4.0
asp.net 3.5 repeater: use dataitem in codebehind function
Asp.net .aspx and MVC Co-existing project, the Codebehind/Codefile still existing inside .aspx files after project published
Asp.net change .net framework 4.0 to 3.5
ASP.NET Cache Class - Are there differences between ASP.NET 3.5 and ASP.NET 4.0?
asp.net 3.5 upgrade to 4.0 IIS6 ReturnURL issues
ASP.NET 4.0 control rendering in 3.5 style on IIS6
ASP.NET 4.0 application under 3.5 application pool
asp.net c# codefile not working properly
Related Tags