.net Diagnostics best practices?

Question

We initially didn't use any logging or debug tracing but after spending few weeks to trace down some data corruption we decided to put required Debug.Write and Trace for production and Debug.Assert

So now question is What is the best practice to use debug and trace logging. I am just looking for some thing generic.

public void AddRectodatabase(object record)
{
   Debug.WriteLine(record.ToString());
   Trace.WriteLine(record.ToString());

   // Add it to databse

   Debug.Assert(true, "Use this on case by case basis");
}

Is this good enough for general purpose, am i doing anything wrong in there?

We want to stick with .net System.Diagnostics over other alternatives like log4net.

Is there any thing else useful in System.Diagnostics?

Answer 1

You should plan on raising ETW trace events throughout your app - not only to alert listeners to issues, but also to provide visibility into the behavior and even performance of your apps' and components' performance.

ETW is an (insanely) high performance and (astonishingly) low-impact way of raising events that can be gathered and analyzed - even in production environments. It's the logging & tracing infrastructure used throughout Windows, SQL, etc.

Three useful links for you:

1. Diagnostics: Using ETW tracing in .NET 3.5 (EventProviderTraceListener)
2. Controlling .NET Framework Logging link text
3. Two Minute Drill: Introduction to XPerf

Read all 3 in order and then re-read - later information will be highly useful, but will be harder to understand unless you grasp the basics first ;) Ignore the instructions to use logman to start and stop your trace collections; use XPerf instead.

If you've not yet seen the Perf toolkit and XPerf viewer , then you're in for a treat! :D

I strongly encourage you to consider raising start & stop events at the start and end of all of your apps' most important features so that you can overlay these events with other telemetry so that you can see, for example, the impact of your apps features on Disk, network, memory, CPU, etc.

Hope this helps.

Answer 2

This response is late, but ...

I think you should consider using TraceSources rather than Debug.WriteLine and/or Trace.WriteLine. With TraceSources, you can achieve a higher level of control over your logging. The level of each TraceSource can be controlled as can the destination of the TraceSource (TraceListener). You can write code like this:

public class RectToSqlServer : IDatabaseUtilities
{
  private static readonly TraceSource ts = new TraceSource("RectToSqlServer");

  public void AddRectToDatabase(object record)
  {
    ts.TraceEvent(TraceEventType.Information, "record = {0}", record.ToString());

    //Add record to database ...

  }
}

public class RectToOracle : IDatabaseUtilities
{
  private static readonly TraceSource ts = new TraceSource("RectToOracleServer");

  public void AddRectToDatabase(object record)
  {
    ts.TraceEvent(TraceEventType.Information, "record = {0}", record.ToString());

    //Add record to database ...

  }
}

Now, you can control the logging (level, destination, etc) for each class independently. Also, note that you don't have to add both Trace.WriteLine and Debug.WriteLine to get logging in both debug and release builds. Using TraceSources will put you in a good position to use ETW in the future as there is an ETWTraceListener available starting in .NET (maybe 3.5, certainly by 4.0). BUT this particular ETW functionality is only available on Vista and later OS's.

To add capability to System.Diagnostics (primarily - maybe only - if logging via TraceSource), look at Ukadc.Diagnostics . Ukadc.Diagnostics adds pretty cool formatting capability (similar to what you can do with log4net and NLog) to System.Diagnostics. There is no code dependency (just install Ukadc.Diagnostics and add some configuration to your app.config). I have to say that I think it is really cool.

If you want to put in a little work to wrap your access to TraceSources, see here for an interesting implementation of a TraceSource wrapper that essentially gives TraceSources the ability to "inherit" logging configuration from "ancestor" TraceSources (like how log4net and NLog loggers can inherit logging settings).

Answer 3

You are using it fine except for Assert with first argument hardcoded to true . You should probably add some condition there and the message (second argument) will be printed only if the condition is false. So in your code example it will never be displayed. In some cases WriteLineIf may come in handy if you don't want to wrap your debug statements in conditional blocks.

Check out the Debug class reference it has quite a few useful methods and properties to help you log things.

Answer 4

System.Diagnostics 还包含 EventLog.WriteEntry，但您可能希望也可能不希望使用跟踪消息淹没 EventLog，尽管这是一种记录主要应用程序事件的简单方法。