Check if a key exists in Memcache

Question

How do I check in PHP if a value is stored in Memcache without fetching it? I don't like fetching it because the values I have set are all 1MB in size and after I fetch it, I have no use for it, so I'm wasting resources. I'm using this in a script that checks if certain keys are cached in memcache and if not, it reads them from a slow data source and sets them in memcache.

Edit: What if I use Memcached::append to append NULL to the key I'm checking? Returns TRUE on success or FALSE on failure. The Memcached::getResultCode will return Memcached::RES_NOTSTORED if the key does not exist. This way I check whether the key exists and it should put the key on top of the LRU list right?

Thank you.

Answer 1

I wonder why Memcached has no special method for it. Here is what I came down to after some considerations:

function has($key)
{
    $m->get($key)

    return \Memcached::RES_NOTFOUND !== $m->getResultCode();
}

Answer 2

I am not sure if this is of any help to you, but you can use

Memcache::add  (  string $key  ,  mixed $var)

It will return false if the key already exists.

In case true is returned you may use

Memcache::delete  (  string $key)

to remove the key you just set. That way you won't need to fetch the data.

Answer 3

Basically what you want to do is to fill memcached with your data, right?

The thing is that asking if a key is there withouth retrieving the value is not very useful. See this case scenario:

You ask if a key exists and it does. Just after you ask, the data of the key is expelled from the cache. While your response is coming back saying that the date is there, the reality is that the data is not there. So you lost time asking, because the answer is different from reality.

I guess what you want to do is to ask if a key exists, and then if it does not, fill it with your data. Why don't you fill directly all the data? Btw, have you considered that while you are filling memcached with data, you could be expelling keys you just previously inserted?

Answer 4

I've solved this by using Memcached::append. I try appending value NULL and if it returns TRUE, it means the key exists. If it returns FALSE it means the key doesn't exist. If the key exist it will also put it on top of LRU list.

Answer 5

I don't like the add/delete suggestion because it inserts invalid data your application may depend on being valid. If your application does make this assumption it would cause a subtle bug that occurs every so often due to the race condition it introduces.

One solution is to take a look at the value and if its temp data pretend its not there, but that would require all application code to use the same api or you'd need to update the application itself, neither are fun and somewhat error prone due to the additional complexity.

If the set of keys is small enough you could store that in memcached and use that determine whether or not to retrieve the data from source again. However, if its as large or larger the the value this method is worse then just getting the entire value from memcached.

You could then solve the new problem by using a index to separate your keys into smaller sets (of course a good way to shard this data so each bucket is a certain size is easier said then done.)

The implementation would consist of using memcached append or prepend to maintain your list of keys tied to some master key or a master key which points to a set of sub_keys which point to the keys themselves :)

Either way you're making the application more and more complex, so I'd only recommend doing this if there is indeed a bottleneck (like there would be if the keys existence needs to be checked often over a network), or if usability in a concern (latency).

In my case I will not do this because I am only going to be accessing memcached over localhost and am using it as more of an extension to my application to cache resources that take more then a few seconds to load normally.

Answer 6

Simply not possible, It is not possible to check for only key exists or not. Better you create a separate key with true/false values to check for existence of keys

Answer 7

memcached now has the cas command. you can use it with a cas unique as 0 to get the EXISTS or NOT_FOUND responses:

$ telnet localhost 11211
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
set hello 0 0 5
12345
STORED
gets hello
VALUE hello 0 5 6743
12345
END
cas hello 0 0 0 0

EXISTS
cas foo 0 0 0 0 

NOT_FOUND

In the transcript above, I first use the set command to set a key hello with value 12345. Then gets it back, which also returned a cas unique 6743. Then I try to use cas command to replace the value with nothing, but because the cas unique I used is 0, I got back EXISTS error.

Finally I try to use cas to set a key foo that doesn't exist and get back NOT_FOUND error.

Because memcached uses a global incrementing value for cas unique, using 0 is safe that it's not valid for the item you are trying to set and you would get back EXISTS error if it does exist.

Sorry, not familiar with php's memcache client to put it in php code.

Answer 8

最简单的方法是获取给定的密钥并将其转换为布尔值。

(bool) Memcache::get(string $key)

Answer 9

(a little late to the discussion, but) actually you can access all the keys/values stored in the memcache, per:

$allSlabs = $memcache->getExtendedStats('slabs');
$items = $memcache->getExtendedStats('items');

foreach ($allSlabs as $server => $slabs)
   foreach ($slabs as $slabId => $slabMeta)
       foreach ($memcache->getExtendedStats('cachedump', (int) $slabId) as $entries)
           if (!empty($entries))
               foreach ($entries as $key => $entry)

Answer 10

This makes no sense from Memcached perspective. If you want to avoid the slow datasource (by a scheduled job, I presume?), save the data to a faster but still stable datasource (eg a file) in your scheduled job. When you need the data, try to read from Memcached first, and if that fails read the file and save it into Memcached.

Memcached cannot give you a good answer, as pakore have already answered. The architecture is not meant to be a stable datasource.

Answer 11

I needed a reliable test to know wether to use memcache Set or memcache replace.

This is what I ended up with.

Another option would be to set up a network socket to the memcache query, but in the end it would end up doing the same and this connection already exists, saving me the overhead of making and maintaining another connection like in Joel Chen's answer.

$key = 'test';
$value = 'foobarbaz';
/**
 * Intricate dance to test if key exists.
 * If it doesn't exist flags will remain a boolean and we need to use the method set.
 * If it does exist it'll be set to integer indicating the compression and what not, then we need to use replace.
 */
$storageFlag = (is_null($value) || is_bool($value) || is_int($value) || is_float($value) ? false : MEMCACHE_COMPRESSED);
$flags = false;
$memcache->get($key, $flags);
if(false === $flags) {
    $memcache->set($key, $value, storageFlag  , $minutes);
}
else {
    $memcache->replace($key, $value, storageFlag, $minutes);
}

Now if you have "large data" the solution is fairly simple. Use a second key in cojoin that contains something simple like an integer to check. Always use them together and you have no issues.

$key = 'test';
$value = 'foobarbaz';

$storageFlag = (is_null($value) || is_bool($value) || is_int($value) || is_float($value) ? false : MEMCACHE_COMPRESSED);
$flags = false;
$exist_key = $key.'_exists';

$memcache->get($exist_key, $flags);
if(false === $flags) {
    $memcache->set($key, $value, storageFlag  , $minutes);
    $memcache->set($exist_key, 42, false  , $minutes);
}
else {
    $memcache->replace($key, $value, storageFlag, $minutes);
    $memcache->replace($exist_key, 42, false  , $minutes);
}