简体   繁体   中英

Ruby: method inexplicably overwritten and set to nil

If I execute this ruby code:

def foo
  100
end

p defined?(foo), foo
if false
  foo = 200
end
p defined?(foo), foo

The output I get is:

"method"
100
"local-variable"
nil

Can someone explain to me why foo is set to nil after not executing the if? Is this expected behavior or a ruby bug?

Names on the left hand side of assignments get set to nil , even if the code can't be reached as in the if false case.

>> foo
NameError: undefined local variable or method `foo' for main:Object
...
>> if false
..   foo = 1
..   end #=> nil
>> foo #=> nil

When Ruby tries to resolve barewords, it first looks for local variables (there's a reference to that in the Pickaxe book, which I can't seem to find at the moment). Since you now have one called foo it displays nil . As Mischa noted, the method still can be called as foo() .

This is what my pal and Ruby super-expert Josh Cheek had to say:

When Ruby sees the assignment, it initializes the variable in the current scope and sets it to nil. Since the assignment didn't get run, it didn't update the value of foo.

if statements don't change scope like blocks do. This is also the most important difference between

for x in xs

and

xs.each { |x| }

Here's another example:

a = 123 if a  # => nil
a  # => nil

We shouldn't be able to say if a because we never set a , but Ruby sees the a = 123 and initializes a , then gets to if a at which point a is nil

I'd consider it a quirk of the interpreter, really. Gary Bernhardt makes fun of it in wat ( https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat ) with a = a

-Josh

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM