简体   繁体   中英

Which GWT EventBus should I use?

In the gwt-user.jar there are 2 EventBus interfaces and SimpleEventBus implmentations.

com.google.gwt.event.shared.EventBus and com.google.web.bindery.event.shared.EventBus I'll refer to these as 'gwt.event' and 'web.bindery'.

Looking at the JavaDocs and source code I can see that the gwt.event merely wraps the web.bindery one. However the gwt.event implementation also hides a number of deprecated methods

So which implementation should I use? (I'm on GWT 2.4)

Generally you should use the one in com.google.web.bindery . The only version used to be in com.google.gwt.event , but when RequestFactory and AutoBeans were moved out of GWT itself and into com.google.web.bindery so they could work in non-GWT clients.

If you use the com.google.web.bindery version in your presenters and such, it will make it easier to use outside GWT apps, should you need to. You'll also not get deprecation warnings when passing that instance to PlaceController and other classes that use EventBus.

I know this question has already an answer but might be worth while adding the following. As I said in my comment above, Activity still needs the com.google.gwt.event.shared.EventBus class. To avoid deprecated warnings, I did the following (I use GIN):

public class GinClientModule extends AbstractGinModule {

    @Override
    protected void configure() {
        bind(EventBus.class).to(SimpleEventBus.class).in(Singleton.class);
        ...
    }

    @Provides
    @Singleton
    public com.google.gwt.event.shared.EventBus adjustEventBus(
            EventBus busBindery) {
        return (com.google.gwt.event.shared.EventBus) busBindery;
    }

...

By doing this, you will always be using the object from the "new" version of Event bus in the bindery package.

如果您使用活动,那么您可能必须使用已弃用的活动,至少在他们清理整个API之前: http//code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id = 6653

To make the choice even more complex. I am using guava in my GWT application and the google guys have added yet another EventBus in there (even less feature complete).

Maybe those guys need to sit together and define ONE implementation to rule them all ?

Obviously I would like to avoid all dependencies on GWT for code that is not strictly used in GWT code, so the Guava one looked interesting to me.

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM