I'm currently working on a project that involves calculating electric fields and there gradients in 3D space. This requires numerically solving Laplace's equation and I have written a class to do this (below) which works but here it is just for background;
################################################################################
# class: ThreeDRectLaplaceSolver #
# #
# A class to solve the Laplace equation given the potential on the boundaries.#
################################################################################
class ThreeDCuboidLaplaceSolver:
#############################################################################
# Store the init variables as class varibales, calculate the grid spacing to#
# solve Laplace's equation on and create arrays to store the iterations and #
# results in. #
############################################################################
def __init__(self, xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax, zmin, zmax, gridstep):
self.xmin, self.xmax = xmin, xmax
self.ymin, self.ymax = ymin, ymax
self.zmin, self.zmax = zmin, zmax
self.xpoints = int((xmax-xmin)/gridstep) + 1
self.ypoints = int((ymax-ymin)/gridstep) + 1
self.zpoints = int((zmax-zmin)/gridstep) + 1
self.dx = (xmax-xmin)/self.xpoints
self.dy = (ymax-ymin)/self.ypoints
self.dz = (zmax-zmin)/self.zpoints
self.v = np.zeros((self.xpoints, self.ypoints, self.zpoints))
self.old_v = self.v.copy()
self.timeStep = 0
############################################################################
# Set constant values along the boundaries #
# #
# Top(bottom) is +ive(-ive) end of z-axis #
# Right(left) is +ive(-ive) end of y-axis #
# Front(back) is +ive(-ive) end of x-axis #
############################################################################
def setBC(self, frontBC, backBC, rightBC, leftBC, topBC, bottomBC):
self.v[-1, :, :] = frontBC
self.v[0 , :, :] = backBC
self.v[: ,-1, :] = rightBC
self.v[: , 0, :] = leftBC
self.v[: , :,-1] = topBC
self.v[: , :, 0] = bottomBC
self.old_v = self.v.copy()
def solve_slow(self, PercentageTolerance = 5):
PercentageError = PercentageTolerance + 1
while PercentageError > PercentageTolerance:
self.Iterate()
PercentageError = self.Get_LargestPercentageError()
print "Completed iteration number %s \n Percentage Error is %s\n" % (str(self.timeStep), str(PercentageError))
return self.v
def solve_quick(self, Tolerance = 2):
AbsError = Tolerance + 1
while AbsError > Tolerance:
self.Iterate()
AbsError = self.Get_LargestAbsError()
print "Completed iteration number %s \nAbsolute Error is %s\n" % (str(self.timeStep), str(AbsError))
return self.v
def Get_LargestAbsError(self):
return np.sqrt((self.v - self.old_v)**2).max()
def Get_LargestPercentageError(self):
AbsDiff = (np.sqrt((self.v - self.old_v)**2)).flatten()
v = self.v.flatten()
vLength = len(v)
Errors = []
i=0
while i < vLength:
if v[i]==0 and AbsDiff[i]==0:
Errors.append(0)
elif v[i]==0 and AbsDiff[i]!=0:
Errors.append(np.infty)
else:
Errors.append(AbsDiff[i]/v[i])
i+=1
return max(Errors)*100
# Perform one round of iteration (ie the value at each point is iterated by one timestep)
def Iterate(self):
self.old_v = self.v.copy()
print self.Get_vAt(0,5,0)
self.v[1:-1,1:-1,1:-1] = (1/26)*(self.v[0:-2, 2:, 2: ] + self.v[0:-2, 1:-1, 2: ] + self.v[0:-2, 0:-2, 2: ] +\
self.v[1:-1, 2:, 2: ] + self.v[1:-1, 1:-1, 2: ] + self.v[1:-1, 0:-2, 2: ] +\
self.v[2: , 2:, 2: ] + self.v[2: , 1:-1, 2: ] + self.v[2: , 0:-2, 2: ] +\
self.v[0:-2, 2:, 1:-1] + self.v[0:-2, 1:-1, 1:-1] + self.v[0:-2, 0:-2, 1:-1] +\
self.v[1:-1, 2:, 1:-1] + self.v[1:-1, 0:-2, 1:-1] +\
self.v[2: , 2:, 1:-1] + self.v[2: , 1:-1, 1:-1] + self.v[2: , 0:-2, 1:-1] +\
self.v[0:-2, 2:, 0:-2] + self.v[0:-2, 1:-1, 0:-2] + self.v[0:-2, 0:-2, 0:-2] +\
self.v[1:-1, 2:, 0:-2] + self.v[1:-1, 1:-1, 0:-2] + self.v[1:-1, 0:-2, 0:-2] +\
self.v[2: , 2:, 0:-2] + self.v[2: , 1:-1, 0:-2] + self.v[2: , 0:-2, 0:-2])
self.timeStep += 1
# Iterate through a certain number of time steps
def IterateSteps(self, timeSteps):
i = 0
while i < timeSteps:
self.Iterate()
i+=1
# Get the value of v at a point (entered as coordinates, NOT indices)
def Get_vAt(self, xPoint, yPoint, zPoint):
# Find the indices nearest to the coordinates entered
diff = [np.sqrt((x-xPoint)**2) for x in np.linspace(self.xmin,self.xmax,self.xpoints)]
xIndex = diff.index(min(diff))
diff = [np.sqrt((y-yPoint)**2) for y in np.linspace(self.ymin,self.ymax,self.ypoints)]
yIndex = diff.index(min(diff))
diff = [np.sqrt((z-zPoint)**2) for z in np.linspace(self.zmin,self.zmax,self.zpoints)]
zIndex = diff.index(min(diff))
# retun the value from of v at this point
return self.v[xIndex, yIndex, zIndex]
So when I run a the following
solver = ThreeDCuboidLaplaceSolver(0, 20, 0, 10, 0, 20, 1)
TwoDsolver = TwoDRectLaplaceSolver(0,20,0,10,1)
TwoDsolver.setBC(1000,0,0,0)
v_0 = np.zeros((21,11))
v_0[4:6,4:6] = 1000
v_0[14:15, 9:10] = 2000
solver.setBC(0,0,0,0,0,v_0)
v = solver.solve_quick(0.00001)
I get a 3D numpy array with the value of the potential (V) at each point on my grid. However in order to do more useful things with this I would like to be able to approximate this array of values with a continuous function so I can calculate the field and its gradient at points not on my grid.
A) Is this possibe? B) How would you go about doing this? I have seen basic scipy fitting functions but nothing that would handle 3D data in this way (or indeed fit an analogous function for a 2D array).
Might be a long shot that someone has tried to do this before but any help would be really appreciated,
Thanks
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.ndimage.interpolation.map_coordinates.html uses splines to interpolate the data and you choose the degree of the spline with the order paramter, default 3.
If you are familiar with spline interpolation it "patches" datapoints using low degree polynomials. A quick read on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spline_interpolation or http://math.tut.fi/~piche/numa2/lecture16.pdf
The order of the polynomial reduces error at the cost of computation time, if your data is not so irregular you can go ahead and try with a lower order.
Another option might be looking at Finite Element Method (FEM) libraries. With proper elements, interpolating gradients is in general more accurate than finite differences based methods. Eg Fenics has a nice python interface. In the tutorial the little more general case of the poisson equation is presented, which can be easily adapted to the Laplace equation.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.