I have a problem with Automapper. I set up a test windows form application and below is the code. Also look at the comments after each MessageBox:
public class FirstClass
{
public string FirstProp { get; set; }
public IList<FirstClassChild> Children { get; set; }
}
public class FirstClassChild
{
public string FirstChildProp { get; set; }
}
public class SecondClass
{
public string FirstProp { get; set; }
public string SecondProp { get; set; }
public IList<SecondClassChild> Children { get; set; }
}
public class SecondClassChild
{
public string FirstChildProp { get; set; }
public string SecondChildProp { get; set; }
}
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<FirstClass, SecondClass>();
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<FirstClassChild, SecondClassChild>();
var f = new FirstClass { FirstProp = "FirstClass" };
f.Children = new List<FirstClassChild> { new FirstClassChild { FirstChildProp = "FirstClass" } };
var s = new SecondClass { FirstProp = "SecondClass", SecondProp = "SecondClass" };
s.Children = new List<SecondClassChild> { new SecondClassChild { FirstChildProp = "SecondClass", SecondChildProp = "SecondClass" } };
AutoMapper.Mapper.Map(f, s);
var fc = new FirstClassChild { FirstChildProp = "FirstClass" };
var sc = new SecondClassChild { FirstChildProp = "SecondClass", SecondChildProp = "SecondClass" };
AutoMapper.Mapper.Map(fc, sc);
MessageBox.Show(sc.FirstChildProp);//FirstClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(sc.SecondChildProp);//SecondClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(s.FirstProp);//FirstClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(s.SecondProp);//SecondClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(s.Children.First().FirstChildProp);//FirstClass as expected
MessageBox.Show(s.Children.First().SecondChildProp);//Empty not expected!!
}
}
What can I do to avoid this? Is this behavior expected? Anyway can anyone guide me how make SecondClass childs SecondChildProp to remain "SecondClass" as it is before the mapping occurs.
I asked a similar question here and found another similar one here .
I think @PatrickSteele makes a very good point: how is AutoMapper supposed to map a source list to a dest list of existing objects , when the dest list may not necessarily bear any resemblance to the source list? ie " But what if one list has 3 and the other list has 5? "
If you are sure that FirstClass
and SecondClass
have the same number of Children
, and if the FirstClass
's Nth Child always corresponds to SecondClass
's Nth child, you could try something like this:
Mapper.CreateMap<FirstClass, SecondClass>()
.ForMember(m => m.Children, o => o.Ignore())
.AfterMap((src, dest) =>
{
for (var i = 0; i < dest.Children.Count; i++)
Mapper.Map(src.Children[i], dest.Children[i]);
});
or if FirstChildProp
is some kind of unique key:
Mapper.CreateMap<FirstClass, SecondClass>()
.ForMember(m => m.Children, o => o.Ignore())
.AfterMap((src, dest) =>
{
foreach (var dChild in dest.Children)
{
var sChild = src.Children.Single(c => c.FirstChildProp == dChild.FirstChildProp);
Mapper.Map(sChild, dChild);
}
});
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.