I'm using maven to build a war file for JBOSS AS 7. After a maven deploy, there is 'test.war' in the local repository, and a 'test-2.war' in the remote repository. This is all as expected (2 is the version in the POM).
If I manually deploy the 'test.war', everything works fine. If I deploy 'test-2.war' the deployment fails. If I rename 'test-2.war' to be 'test.war', the deployment works but trying to access it in a browser fails with error:
type Status report
message /test/Test
description The requested resource (/test/Test) is not available.
Since both war files are the result of the same maven build and deploy, why doesn't renaming the -2 version work the same as the first?
Is there a way I can deploy the -2 version without renaming, or what can I do to force the build so that I can rename the -2 version and have it deploy?
I know I can use maven's jboss deploy, but that's not an option in my case. I need the war file from the remote repository for manual deployments.
EDIT: The basic question here is why can't I rename the file {artifactId}-{version}.war to just {artifactId}.war and have it deploy in JBoss AS 7 properly?
You can rename the war like this:
<project>
...
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.3</version>
<configuration>
<warName>bird.war</warName>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
...
</project>
OR
<build>
<finalName>bird.war</finalName>
. . .
</build>
Take a look here
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.