繁体   English   中英

在不导致内存泄漏的情况下在代码中保留周期

[英]having retain cycles in code when its not causing memory leak

#import "ViewController.h"

@implementation A

- (instancetype)init
{
    self = [super init];

    if (self)
    {
        self.databaseQueue = dispatch_queue_create("someQueue", DISPATCH_QUEUE_SERIAL);
    }

    return self;
}
- (void) privateLogMethod
{
    NSLog(@"private log method called");
    [NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:1];
}

- (void) performSomeAction
{
    for (NSInteger i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
        dispatch_async(_databaseQueue, ^{
            NSLog(@"inside for loop");
            [self privateLogMethod];
        });
    }
}

- (void) dealloc
{
    NSLog(@"removing A from memory");
}

@end

@implementation ViewController

- (void)viewDidLoad {
    [super viewDidLoad];

    self.someClassA = [[A alloc] init];

    [self.someClassA performSomeAction];

    [self performSelector:@selector(removeA) withObject:nil afterDelay:5];
}

- (void) removeA
{
    NSLog(@"call to remove A from memory");
    self.someClassA = nil;
}

@end


#import <UIKit/UIKit.h>

@interface A: NSObject
- (void) performSomeAction;
@property (nonatomic, strong) dispatch_queue_t databaseQueue;
@end

@interface ViewController : UIViewController
@property (nonatomic, strong) A* someClassA;
@end

如果我们看到上面的代码,那么就有一个保留周期,因为class A持有databaseQueuedatabaseQueue保持self 因此,当ViewController询问到dealloc A 5秒后, class A持有之前完成环路deallocating本身。 以下是输出。

2017-09-14 14:21:06.774517+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:06.774768+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:07.775218+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:07.775480+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:08.778805+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:08.779251+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:09.784467+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:09.785089+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:10.790469+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:10.790929+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:11.775522+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812575] **call to remove A from memory**
2017-09-14 14:21:11.796196+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:11.796659+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:12.802018+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:12.802483+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:13.804953+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:13.805432+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:14.806252+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:14.806604+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:15.807852+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] inside for loop
2017-09-14 14:21:15.808306+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] private log method called
2017-09-14 14:21:16.809550+0530 testdealloc[72021:1812626] **removing A from memory**

我的问题是:我们在代码中有一个保留周期,但是,这不会导致内存泄漏。 在这种情况下,是否可以保留代码[因为它确实不会导致内存泄漏]? 或者我应该在块中使用__weak weakSelf = self然后使用weakSelf来确保根本没有保留周期?

你问:

这个可以吗?

很大程度上,是的。

更准确地说,这取决于您的需求/意图。 如果您需要继续运行以使您的应用程序正常运行(例如,您可能正在转换并保存一些图像),那么您肯定需要一个强大的参考,以便它完成)。

但如果您不需要继续执行,那么您将使用weakSelf模式。 例如,假设您在视图控制器中有一系列调度任务,这些任务仅用于以后触发UI更新。 在这种情况下,如果视图控制器被解除,您可能不需要运行这些块,并且您当然不希望它挂起到视图控制器以查看已被解雇的视图。 (您甚至可能希望在取消视图控制器时取消这些已分派的项目,但这是另一个主题。)

底线,这取决于你的意图。

我是第二个@Rob。 但寻找任何避免保留周期的机会。 这对于一个简单的项目是可以的,但是在处理复杂的项目时...它会节省大量时间来尝试调试/解决您不确定根本原因的问题。

这是一篇很好的文章,解释了不同类型的保留周期并避免它们。

https://www.cocoawithlove.com/2009/07/rules-to-avoid-retain-cycles.html

暂无
暂无

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM