繁体   English   中英

R lpsolve 获得第 2、3、Nth 最佳解决方案

[英]R lpsolve get 2nd,3rd,Nth best solution

我正在尝试在 R 中使用 lpsolveapi 解决优化问题。 我不仅要获得最佳解决方案,还要获得次佳(通过第 n 个)解决方案。 该应用程序适用于梦幻足球,您在 5 个不同的位置拥有一定数量的不同体型的球员,并有一个不能超过的总薪水限制。 我在这里找到了解决方案,但无法适应我的问题。

我假设我需要使用来自get.objective(lp_model)的值添加一个约束。 我试过这样做,但我认为我没有正确设置它,因为我仍然只得到 1 个解决方案。

理想情况下,我正在寻找一个看起来像这样的解决方案(具有适当数量的玩家):

> sols
[[1]]
[1] 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1

[[2]]
[1] 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0

到目前为止,这是我的代码:

library(lpSolveAPI)

Dataset <- matrix(c("DET","SF","NO","D.Prescott","A.Smith","C.Newton","L.Miller","C.McCaffrey","A.Kamara","D.Freeman","C.Hyde","C.Thompson","D.Murray","D.Bryant","D.Baldwin","A.Green","T.Hill","J.Landry","M.Crabtree","L.Fitzgerald","G.Tate","A.Seferian-Jenkins","V.Davis","D.Walker","J.Cook",1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5,3000,3200,3400,6700,6500,6300,6200,6500,6300,6600,5200,6100,5400,6400,6900,7400,6700,6300,6500,5900,6300,4900,4100,4900,4000,7.679411765,7.309444444,7.061764706,20.66725263,19.58133684,18.78134737,16.08178947,14.93878947,14.605,14.02315789,13.93152632,13.92768421,12.94,15.66052632,15.38147368,14.85521053,14.60457895,14.56222222,14.44427778,14.23257895,14.16161111,11.09,10.95147368,10.52473684,9.581222222), ncol=4)
colnames(Dataset) <- c('Name','Position2','Salary','Pts')
Dataset <- data.frame(Dataset)
Dataset$Position2 <- as.numeric(Dataset$Position2)
Dataset$Salary <- as.numeric(Dataset$Salary)
Dataset$Pts <- as.numeric(Dataset$Pts)

lp_model= make.lp(0, nrow(Dataset))

set.objfn(lp_model, Dataset$Pts)
add.constraint(lp_model, rep(1,nrow(Dataset)), "=", 9)
add.constraint(lp_model, as.vector(Dataset$Salary), "<=", 50000)
add.constraint(lp_model, Dataset$Position2==1, "=", 1)
add.constraint(lp_model, Dataset$Position2==2, "=", 1)
add.constraint(lp_model, Dataset$Position2==3, ">=", 2)
add.constraint(lp_model, Dataset$Position2==3, "<=", 3)
add.constraint(lp_model, Dataset$Position2==4, ">=", 3)
add.constraint(lp_model, Dataset$Position2==4, "<=", 4)
add.constraint(lp_model, Dataset$Position2==5, ">=", 1)
add.constraint(lp_model, Dataset$Position2==5, "<=", 2)
lp.control(lp_model, sense= "max")
set.type(lp_model, 1:nrow(Dataset), "binary")

lp_model
solve(lp_model)
get.variables(lp_model)
get.objective(lp_model)
get.constr.value((lp_model))
get.total.iter(lp_model)
get.solutioncount(lp_model)

rc<-solve(lp_model)
sols<-list()
obj0<-get.objective(lp_model)
counter = 0
# find more solutions
while(TRUE) {
  counts <- matrix(obj0, ncol=nrow(Dataset))
  counter = counter+1
  sol <- round(get.variables(lp_model))
  sols <- c(sols,list(sol))
  add.constraint(lp_model,counts,"<",obj0)
  rc<-solve(lp_model)
  obj0<-get.objective(lp_model)
  if (rc!=0) break;
  if (counter == 5) break;
}
sols

我找到了一个基于玩弄它的解决方案。 我从上面的链接切换回原来的答案并添加了一个计数器。 这是代码:

rc<-solve(lp_model)
sols<-list()
obj0<-get.objective(lp_model)
while(TRUE) {
  counter = counter+1
  sol <- round(get.variables(lp_model))
  sols <- c(sols,list(sol))
  add.constraint(lp_model,2*sol-1,"<=", sum(sol)-1)
  rc<-solve(lp_model)
  #if (rc!=0) break;
  #if (get.objective(lp_model)<obj0-1e-6) break;
  if (counter == 5) break;
}
sols

暂无
暂无

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM