分段错误和Valgrind没有在C中的Trie树上堆叠地址错误

Question

我正在用C语言写一个Trie Tree，结构如下：

typedef struct sNode Node;
struct sNode {
    int word;
    unsigned int nsons;
    Node *next[26];
};

typedef struct {
     Node *root;
} Trie;

但是我在这个插入函数中遇到了问题：

int insert(Trie* trie, char word[]){
    int i=0, posiletter, contletters=0;
    char letter=word[0];
    Node *newroot;
    Node *newNode=NULL;
    Node **copyroot;
    Node *current=NULL;
    Node *Nodefather=NULL;
    Node verif;


    if (trie->root=NULL){
        newroot=malloc(sizeof(Node));   
        for (i=0; i<=25; i++) newroot->next[i]=NULL;
        newroot->nsons=0;
        newroot->word=0;
        trie->root=newroot;
    }
    copyroot=&trie->root;
    current=*copyroot;
    while (word[contletters]!='\0'){
        posiletter=(word[contletters])-'a';

        while( (current->next[posiletter])!= NULL ){ // Error in this line
            Nodefather=current;
            current=current->next[posiletter];
        }
        if ( (current->next[letter-'a']) == NULL ){
            newNode=malloc(sizeof(Node));
            //newNode=malloc(sizeof(Node));   
            for (i=0; i<=25; i++) newNode->next[i]=NULL;
            newNode->nsons=0;
            newNode->word=0;
            Nodefather->next[letter-'a']=newNode;
            Nodefather->nsons=(Nodefather->nsons)+1;

        }
        contletters++;

    }
    if  (letter=='\0') Nodefather->next[letter-'a']->word=1; //end of word
    return 1;
}

该函数接收指向树和字符串的指针。 如果Trie的根是NULL，它会创建一个节点，在此之后，它会在数组上搜索要存储的空闲（NULL）位置。

问题出在这一行：

while( (current->next[posiletter])!= NULL ){ // Error in this line

它在我执行此操作时给出了Segmentation fault错误，并且在GDB上出现此错误：

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0804883f in insert (trie=0x804b008, word=0xbffff230 "abcdef") at trie.c:97
97          while( (current->next[posiletter])!= NULL ){ // Error in this line

并以这种方式使用Valgrind：valgrind --tool = memcheck --leak-check = full --track-originins = yes ./trie它给了我这些错误

==3409== Invalid read of size 4
==3409==    at 0x804883F: insert (trie.c:97)
==3409==    by 0x80485FD: main (triet.c:36)
==3409==  Address 0x8 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==3409== 
==3409== 
==3409== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==3409==  Access not within mapped region at address 0x8
==3409==    at 0x804883F: insert (trie.c:97)
==3409==    by 0x80485FD: main (triet.c:36)
==3409==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==3409==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==3409==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==3409==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==3409==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==3409== HEAP SUMMARY:
==3409==     in use at exit: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
==3409==   total heap usage: 1 allocs, 0 frees, 4 bytes allocated
==3409== 
==3409== LEAK SUMMARY:
==3409==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3409==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3409==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3409==    still reachable: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
==3409==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3409== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==3409== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
==3409== 
==3409== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==3409== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 11 from 6)
Segmentation fault

我非常感谢任何帮助。 谢谢！

====编辑====崩溃时的值：

(gdb) print current
$1 = (Node *) 0x0
(gdb) print current->next
Isn't possible acess the memory at the address 0x8
(gdb) print current->next[posiletter]
Isn't possible acess the memory at the address 0x8
(gdb) print posiletter
$2 = 0

=== Edit2 ===要求的其他值：

(gdb) print contletters
$3 = 0
(gdb) print trie->root
$4 = (Node *) 0x0
(gdb) print trie->root->next[word[0]-'a']
Isn't possible acess the memory at the address 0x8

Answer 1

啊我怎么想念那个！

这是你的问题：

if (trie->root=NULL)

应该

if (trie->root == NULL)

注意== 。

你编写它的方式，你将root设置为NULL ，其值为false并且永远不会完成根初始化。 你可以通过你的gdb为trie->root输出0x0来解决trie->root