简体   繁体   English

在Scala中创建泛型类型的实例?

[英]Create an instance of a generic type in Scala?

I am trying my hand at a bit of generic programming with Scala and am trying to figure out how to create an instance of a class of type CC as described in the code below. 我正在尝试使用Scala进行一些泛型编程,并试图弄清楚如何创建CC类型的实例,如下面的代码所述。 I have defined the following abstract trait... 我定义了以下抽象特征...

/** Trait defining the interface for an `OrderBook`.
  *
  * @tparam O type of `Order` stored in the order book.
  * @tparam CC type of collection used to store `Order` instances.
  */
trait OrderBook[O <: Order, CC <: collection.GenMap[UUID, O]] {

  /** All `Orders` contained in an `OrderBook` should be for the same `Tradable`. */
  def tradable: Tradable

  /** Add an `Order` to the `OrderBook`.
    *
    * @param order the `Order` that should be added to the `OrderBook`.
    */
  def add(order: O): Unit

  /** Filter the `OrderBook` and return those `Order` instances satisfying the given predicate.
    *
    * @param p predicate defining desirable `Order` characteristics.
    * @return collection of `Order` instances satisfying the given predicate.
    */
  def filter(p: (O) => Boolean): Option[collection.GenIterable[O]] = {
    val filteredOrders = existingOrders.filter { case (_, order) => p(order) }
    if (filteredOrders.nonEmpty) Some(filteredOrders.values) else None
  }

  /** Find the first `Order` in the `OrderBook` that satisfies the given predicate.
    *
    * @param p predicate defining desirable `Order` characteristics.
    * @return `None` if no `Order` in the `OrderBook` satisfies the predicate; `Some(order)` otherwise.
    */
  def find(p: (O) => Boolean): Option[O] = existingOrders.find { case (_, order) => p(order) } match {
    case Some((_, order)) => Some(order)
    case None => None
  }

  /** Return the head `Order` of the `OrderBook`.
    *
    * @return `None` if the `OrderBook` is empty; `Some(order)` otherwise.
    */
  def headOption: Option[O] = existingOrders.values.headOption

  /** Remove and return the head `Order` of the `OrderBook`.
    *
    * @return `None` if the `OrderBook` is empty; `Some(order)` otherwise.
    */
  def remove(): Option[O] = {
    headOption match {
      case Some(order) => remove(order.uuid)
      case None => None
    }
  }

  /** Remove and return an existing `Order` from the `OrderBook`.
    *
    * @param uuid the `UUID` for the order that should be removed from the `OrderBook`.
    * @return `None` if the `uuid` is not found in the `OrderBook`; `Some(order)` otherwise.
    */
  def remove(uuid: UUID): Option[O]

  /* Underlying collection of `Order` instances. */
  protected def existingOrders: CC

}

...and then hidden implementations of this trait in the companion object in order to force users who wish to create their own special OrderBook classes to use the interface defined in the trait rather than subclass from concrete implementations. ...然后在伴随对象中隐藏此特征的实现,以强制希望创建自己的特殊OrderBook类的用户使用特征中定义的接口,而不是具体实现的子类。 Here is the companion object... 这是同伴对象...

object OrderBook {

  import scala.collection.mutable
  import scala.collection.parallel

  def apply[O <: Order, CC <: mutable.Map[UUID, O]](tradable: Tradable): OrderBook[O, CC] = {
    new MutableOrderBook[O, CC](tradable)
  }

  def apply[O <: Order, CC <: parallel.mutable.ParMap[UUID, O]](tradable: Tradable): OrderBook[O, CC] = {
    new ParallelMutableOrderBook[O, CC](tradable)
  }

  private class MutableOrderBook[O <: Order, CC <: mutable.Map[UUID, O]](val tradable: Tradable)
    extends OrderBook[O, CC] {

    /** Add an `Order` to the `OrderBook`.
      *
      * @param order the `Order` that should be added to the `OrderBook`.
      */
    def add(order: O): Unit = {
      require(order.tradable == tradable)  // can be disabled by compiler?
      existingOrders(order.uuid) = order
    }

    /** Remove and return an existing `Order` from the `OrderBook`.
      *
      * @param uuid the `UUID` for the order that should be removed from the `OrderBook`.
      * @return `None` if the `uuid` is not found in the `OrderBook`; `Some(order)` otherwise.
      */
    def remove(uuid: UUID): Option[O] = existingOrders.remove(uuid)

    /* Underlying collection of `Order` instances. */
    protected val existingOrders: CC = ??? // I want this to be an empty instance of type CC!

  }

  private class ParallelMutableOrderBook[O <: Order, CC <: parallel.mutable.ParMap[UUID, O]](val tradable: Tradable)
    extends OrderBook[O, CC] {
      /// details omitted for brevity!
  }

}

I would like to figure out how to create an empty instance of type CC in my implementation of MutableOrderBook . 我想弄清楚如何在MutableOrderBook实现中创建CC类型的空实例。 I tam hopeful that this can be done without reflection. 我希望这可以在没有反思的情况下完成。 If reflection is required, I would be open to suggestions on how to avoid using reflection for this use case. 如果需要反思,我将公开建议如何避免在此用例中使用反思。 Thoughts? 有什么想法吗?

You can use scala.collection.generic.CanBuildFrom[-From, -Elem, +To] , which is made exactly for this problem. 您可以使用scala.collection.generic.CanBuildFrom[-From, -Elem, +To] ,正是针对此问题而设计的。

private class MutableOrderBook[O <: Order, CC <: mutable.Map[UUID, O]]
    (val tradable: Tradable)(implicit cbf: CanBuildFrom[Nothing, Nothing, CC]) {
    //give me a CanBuildFrom, which can build a CC  out of Nothing.

    ...

    val existingOrders: CC = cbf().result
}

The scala collections library use CanBuildFrom a lot internally, for example to build the right collection in map and flatMap . scala集合库在内部大量使用CanBuildFrom,例如在mapflatMap构建正确的集合。 For further information read this answer. 有关更多信息,请阅读答案。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM