How to get distinct values from an array of objects in JavaScript?

Question

Assuming I have the following:

var array = 
    [
        {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, 
        {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, 
        {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}
    ]

What is the best way to be able to get an array of all of the distinct ages such that I get an result array of:

[17, 35]

Is there some way I could alternatively structure the data or better method such that I would not have to iterate through each array checking the value of "age" and check against another array for its existence, and add it if not?

If there was some way I could just pull out the distinct ages without iterating...

Current inefficient way I would like to improve... If it means that instead of "array" being an array of objects, but a "map" of objects with some unique key (ie "1,2,3") that would be okay too. I'm just looking for the most performance efficient way.

The following is how I currently do it, but for me, iteration appears to just be crummy for efficiency even though it does work...

var distinct = []
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++)
   if (array[i].age not in distinct)
      distinct.push(array[i].age)

Answer 1

If you are using ES6/ES2015 or later you can do it this way:

const data = [
  { group: 'A', name: 'SD' }, 
  { group: 'B', name: 'FI' }, 
  { group: 'A', name: 'MM' },
  { group: 'B', name: 'CO'}
];
const unique = [...new Set(data.map(item => item.group))]; // [ 'A', 'B']

Here is an example on how to do it.

Answer 2

For those who want to return object with all properties unique by key

 const array = [ { "name": "Joe", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 } ] const key = 'age'; const arrayUniqueByKey = [...new Map(array.map(item => [item[key], item])).values()]; console.log(arrayUniqueByKey); /*OUTPUT [ { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 } ] */ // Note: this will pick the last duplicated item in the list.

Answer 3

using ES6

let array = [
  { "name": "Joe", "age": 17 },
  { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 },
  { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 }
];
array.map(item => item.age)
  .filter((value, index, self) => self.indexOf(value) === index)

> [17, 35]

Answer 4

使用 ES6 功能，您可以执行以下操作：

const uniqueAges = [...new Set( array.map(obj => obj.age)) ];

Answer 5

If this were PHP I'd build an array with the keys and take array_keys at the end, but JS has no such luxury. Instead, try this:

var flags = [], output = [], l = array.length, i;
for( i=0; i<l; i++) {
    if( flags[array[i].age]) continue;
    flags[array[i].age] = true;
    output.push(array[i].age);
}

Answer 6

You could use a dictionary approach like this one. Basically you assign the value you want to be distinct as a key in the "dictionary" (here we use an array as an object to avoid dictionary-mode). If the key did not exist then you add that value as distinct.

Here is a working demo:

 var array = [{"name":"Joe", "age":17}, {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}]; var unique = []; var distinct = []; for( let i = 0; i < array.length; i++ ){ if( !unique[array[i].age]){ distinct.push(array[i].age); unique[array[i].age] = 1; } } var d = document.getElementById("d"); d.innerHTML = "" + distinct;

 <div id="d"></div>

This will be O(n) where n is the number of objects in array and m is the number of unique values. There is no faster way than O(n) because you must inspect each value at least once.

The previous version of this used an object, and for in. These were minor in nature, and have since been minorly updated above. However, the reason for a seeming advance in performance between the two versions in the original jsperf was due to the data sample size being so small. Thus, the main comparison in the previous version was looking at the difference between the internal map and filter use versus the dictionary mode lookups.

I have updated the code above, as noted, however, I have also updated the jsperf to look through 1000 objects instead of 3. 3 overlooked many of the performance pitfalls involved ( obsolete jsperf ).

Performance

https://jsperf.com/filter-vs-dictionary-more-data When I ran this dictionary was 96% faster.

Answer 7

从 2017 年 8 月 25 日起，您将通过 ES6 for Typescript 使用新的 Set 来解决此问题

Array.from(new Set(yourArray.map((item: any) => item.id)))

Answer 8

I'd just map and remove dups:

var ages = array.map(function(obj) { return obj.age; });
ages = ages.filter(function(v,i) { return ages.indexOf(v) == i; });

console.log(ages); //=> [17, 35]

Edit: Aight! Not the most efficient way in terms of performance, but the simplest most readable IMO. If you really care about micro-optimization or you have huge amounts of data then a regular for loop is going to be more "efficient".

Answer 9

var unique = array
    .map(p => p.age)
    .filter((age, index, arr) => arr.indexOf(age) == index)
    .sort(); // sorting is optional

// or in ES6

var unique = [...new Set(array.map(p => p.age))];

// or with lodash

var unique = _.uniq(_.map(array, 'age'));

ES6 example

const data = [
  { name: "Joe", age: 17}, 
  { name: "Bob", age: 17}, 
  { name: "Carl", age: 35}
];

const arr = data.map(p => p.age); // [17, 17, 35]
const s = new Set(arr); // {17, 35} a set removes duplications, but it's still a set
const unique = [...s]; // [17, 35] Use the spread operator to transform a set into an Array
// or use Array.from to transform a set into an array
const unique2 = Array.from(s); // [17, 35]

Answer 10

There are many valid answers already, but I wanted to add one that uses only the reduce() method because it is clean and simple.

function uniqueBy(arr, prop){
  return arr.reduce((a, d) => {
    if (!a.includes(d[prop])) { a.push(d[prop]); }
    return a;
  }, []);
}

Use it like this:

var array = [
  {"name": "Joe", "age": 17}, 
  {"name": "Bob", "age": 17}, 
  {"name": "Carl", "age": 35}
];

var ages = uniqueBy(array, "age");
console.log(ages); // [17, 35]

Answer 11

 const array = [ {"id":"93","name":"CVAM_NGP_KW"}, {"id":"94","name":"CVAM_NGP_PB"}, {"id":"93","name":"CVAM_NGP_KW"}, {"id":"94","name":"CVAM_NGP_PB"} ] function uniq(array, field) { return array.reduce((accumulator, current) => { if(!accumulator.includes(current[field])) { accumulator.push(current[field]) } return accumulator; }, [] ) } const ids = uniq(array, 'id'); console.log(ids) /* output ["93", "94"] */

Answer 12

This is a slight variation on the ES6 version if you need the entire object:

let arr = [
    {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, 
    {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, 
    {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}
]
arr.filter((a, i) => arr.findIndex((s) => a.age === s.age) === i) // [{"name":"Joe", "age":17}, {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}]

Answer 13

I have a small solution

let data = [{id: 1}, {id: 2}, {id: 3}, {id: 2}, {id: 3}];

let result = data.filter((value, index, self) => self.findIndex((m) => m.id === value.id) === index);

Answer 14

You may be interested in unique set of objects based on one of the keys:

const array = [
    {"name": "Joe", "age": 17},
    {"name": "Bob", "age": 17},
    {"name": "Carl", "age": 35}
];

const distinctItems = [...new Map(array.map(item => [item["age"], item])).values()];

Result:

[
    {name: "Bob", age: 17},
    {name: "Carl", age: 35}
]

Answer 15

The forEach version of @travis-j's answer (helpful on modern browsers and Node JS world):

var unique = {};
var distinct = [];
array.forEach(function (x) {
  if (!unique[x.age]) {
    distinct.push(x.age);
    unique[x.age] = true;
  }
});

34% faster on Chrome v29.0.1547: http://jsperf.com/filter-versus-dictionary/3

And a generic solution that takes a mapper function (tad slower than direct map, but that's expected):

function uniqueBy(arr, fn) {
  var unique = {};
  var distinct = [];
  arr.forEach(function (x) {
    var key = fn(x);
    if (!unique[key]) {
      distinct.push(key);
      unique[key] = true;
    }
  });
  return distinct;
}

// usage
uniqueBy(array, function(x){return x.age;}); // outputs [17, 35]

Answer 16

I've started sticking Underscore in all new projects by default just so I never have to think about these little data-munging problems.

var array = [{"name":"Joe", "age":17}, {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}];
console.log(_.chain(array).map(function(item) { return item.age }).uniq().value());

Produces [17, 35] .

Answer 17

Here's another way to solve this:

var result = {};
for(var i in array) {
    result[array[i].age] = null;
}

result = Object.keys(result);

or

result = Object.values(result);

I have no idea how fast this solution is compared to the others, but I like the cleaner look. ;-)

---

EDIT: Okay, the above seems to be the slowest solution of all here.

I've created a performance test case here: http://jsperf.com/distinct-values-from-array

Instead of testing for the ages (Integers), I chose to compare the names (Strings).

Method 1 (TS's solution) is very fast. Interestingly enough, Method 7 outperforms all other solutions, here I just got rid of .indexOf() and used a "manual" implementation of it, avoiding looped function calling:

var result = [];
loop1: for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
    var name = array[i].name;
    for (var i2 = 0; i2 < result.length; i2++) {
        if (result[i2] == name) {
            continue loop1;
        }
    }
    result.push(name);
}

The difference in performance using Safari & Firefox is amazing, and it seems like Chrome does the best job on optimization.

I'm not exactly sure why the above snippets is so fast compared to the others, maybe someone wiser than me has an answer. ;-)

Answer 18

using lodash

var array = [
    { "name": "Joe", "age": 17 },
    { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 },
    { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 }
];
_.chain(array).pluck('age').unique().value();
> [17, 35]

Answer 19

 var array = [ {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, {"name":"Carl", "age": 35} ]; const ages = [...new Set(array.reduce((a, c) => [...a, c.age], []))]; console.log(ages);

Answer 20

 const array = [ { "name": "Joe", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 } ] const key = 'age'; const arrayUniqueByKey = [...new Map(array.map(item => [item[key], item])).values()]; console.log(arrayUniqueByKey);

Answer 21

Simple distinct filter using Maps :

 let array = [ {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, {"name":"Carl", "age": 35} ]; let data = new Map(); for (let obj of array) { data.set(obj.age, obj); } let out = [...data.values()]; console.log(out);

Answer 22

Using Lodash

var array = [
    { "name": "Joe", "age": 17 },
    { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 },
    { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 }
];

_.chain(array).map('age').unique().value();

Returns [17,35]

Answer 23

function get_unique_values_from_array_object(array,property){
    var unique = {};
    var distinct = [];
    for( var i in array ){
       if( typeof(unique[array[i][property]]) == "undefined"){
          distinct.push(array[i]);
       }
       unique[array[i][property]] = 0;
    }
    return distinct;
}

Answer 24

underscore.js _.uniq(_.pluck(array,"age"))

Answer 25

Here's a versatile solution that uses reduce, allows for mapping, and maintains insertion order.

items : An array

mapper : A unary function that maps the item to the criteria, or empty to map the item itself.

function distinct(items, mapper) {
    if (!mapper) mapper = (item)=>item;
    return items.map(mapper).reduce((acc, item) => {
        if (acc.indexOf(item) === -1) acc.push(item);
        return acc;
    }, []);
}

Usage

const distinctLastNames = distinct(items, (item)=>item.lastName);
const distinctItems = distinct(items);

You can add this to your Array prototype and leave out the items parameter if that's your style...

const distinctLastNames = items.distinct( (item)=>item.lastName) ) ;
const distinctItems = items.distinct() ;

You can also use a Set instead of an Array to speed up the matching.

function distinct(items, mapper) {
    if (!mapper) mapper = (item)=>item;
    return items.map(mapper).reduce((acc, item) => {
        acc.add(item);
        return acc;
    }, new Set());
}

Answer 26

If you want to have an unique list of objects returned back. here is another alternative:

const unique = (arr, encoder=JSON.stringify, decoder=JSON.parse) =>
  [...new Set(arr.map(item => encoder(item)))].map(item => decoder(item));

Which will turn this:

unique([{"name": "john"}, {"name": "sarah"}, {"name": "john"}])

into

[{"name": "john"}, {"name": "sarah"}]

The trick here is that we are first encoding the items into strings using JSON.stringify , and then we are converting that to a Set (which makes the list of strings unique) and then we are converting it back to the original objects using JSON.parse .

Answer 27

 var array = [ {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, {"name":"Carl", "age": 35} ] console.log(Object.keys(array.reduce((r,{age}) => (r[age]='', r) , {})))

Output:

Array ["17", "35"]

Answer 28

Just found this and I thought it's useful

_.map(_.indexBy(records, '_id'), function(obj){return obj})

Again using underscore , so if you have an object like this

var records = [{_id:1,name:'one', _id:2,name:'two', _id:1,name:'one'}]

it will give you the unique objects only.

What happens here is that indexBy returns a map like this

{ 1:{_id:1,name:'one'}, 2:{_id:2,name:'two'} }

and just because it's a map, all keys are unique.

Then I'm just mapping this list back to array.

In case you need only the distinct values

_.map(_.indexBy(records, '_id'), function(obj,key){return key})

Keep in mind that the key is returned as a string so, if you need integers instead, you should do

_.map(_.indexBy(records, '_id'), function(obj,key){return parseInt(key)})

Answer 29

i think you are looking for groupBy function (using Lodash)

_personsList = [{"name":"Joe", "age":17}, 
                {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, 
                {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}];
_uniqAgeList = _.groupBy(_personsList,"age");
_uniqAges = Object.keys(_uniqAgeList);

produces result:

17,35

jsFiddle demo: http://jsfiddle.net/4J2SX/201/

Answer 30

[...new Set([
    { "name": "Joe", "age": 17 },
    { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 },
    { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 }
  ].map(({ age }) => age))]

Answer 31

如果您有 Array.prototype.includes 或愿意对其进行polyfill ，则可以：

var ages = []; array.forEach(function(x) { if (!ages.includes(x.age)) ages.push(x.age); });

Answer 32

If like me you prefer a more "functional" without compromising speed, this example uses fast dictionary lookup wrapped inside reduce closure.

var array = 
[
    {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, 
    {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, 
    {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}
]
var uniqueAges = array.reduce((p,c,i,a) => {
    if(!p[0][c.age]) {
        p[1].push(p[0][c.age] = c.age);
    }
    if(i<a.length-1) {
        return p
    } else {
        return p[1]
    }
}, [{},[]])

According to this test my solution is twice as fast as the proposed answer

Answer 33

I know my code is little length and little time complexity but it's understandable so I tried this way.

I'm trying to develop prototype based function here and code also change.

Here,Distinct is my own prototype function.

 <script> var array = [{ "name": "Joe", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 } ] Array.prototype.Distinct = () => { var output = []; for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { let flag = true; for (let j = 0; j < output.length; j++) { if (array[i].age == output[j]) { flag = false; break; } } if (flag) output.push(array[i].age); } return output; } //Distinct is my own function console.log(array.Distinct()); </script>

Answer 34

Assuming I have the following:

var array = 
    [
        {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, 
        {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, 
        {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}
    ]

What is the best way to be able to get an array of all of the distinct ages such that I get an result array of:

[17, 35]

Is there some way I could alternatively structure the data or better method such that I would not have to iterate through each array checking the value of "age" and check against another array for its existence, and add it if not?

If there was some way I could just pull out the distinct ages without iterating...

Current inefficent way I would like to improve... If it means that instead of "array" being an array of objects, but a "map" of objects with some unique key (ie "1,2,3") that would be okay too.Im just looking for the most performance efficient way.

The following is how I currently do it, but for me, iteration appears to just be crummy for efficiency even though it does work...

var distinct = []
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++)
   if (array[i].age not in distinct)
      distinct.push(array[i].age)

Answer 35

In case you need unique of whole object

const _ = require('lodash');

var objects = [
  { 'x': 1, 'y': 2 },
  { 'y': 1, 'x': 2 },
  { 'x': 2, 'y': 1 },
  { 'x': 1, 'y': 2 }
];

_.uniqWith(objects, _.isEqual);

[Object {x: 1, y: 2}, Object {x: 2, y: 1}]

Answer 36

There are a lot of great answers here, but none of them have addressed the following line:

Is there some way I could alternatively structure the data

I would create an object whose keys are the ages, each pointing to an array of names.

 var array = [{ "name": "Joe", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 }]; var map = array.reduce(function(result, item) { result[item.age] = result[item.age] || []; result[item.age].push(item.name); return result; }, {}); console.log(Object.keys(map)); console.log(map);

This way you've converted the data structure into one that is very easy to retrieve the distinct ages from.

Here is a more compact version that also stores the entire object instead of just the name (in case you are dealing with objects with more than 2 properties so they cant be stored as key and value).

 var array = [{ "name": "Joe", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 }]; var map = array.reduce((r, i) => ((r[i.age] = r[i.age] || []).push(i), r), {}); console.log(Object.keys(map)); console.log(map);

Answer 37

Primitive Types

var unique = [...new Set(array.map(item => item.pritiveAttribute))];

For complex types eg Objects

var unique = [...new DeepSet(array.map(item => item.Object))];

export class DeepSet extends Set {

  add (o: any) {
    for (let i of this)
      if (this.deepCompare(o, i))
        return this;
    super.add.call(this, o);
    return this;
  };

  private deepCompare(o: any, i: any) {
    return JSON.stringify(o) === JSON.stringify(i)
  }
}

Answer 38

 const array = [{ "name": "Joe", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 } ] const uniqueArrayByProperty = (array, callback) => { return array.reduce((prev, item) => { const v = callback(item); if (!prev.includes(v)) prev.push(v) return prev }, []) } console.log(uniqueArrayByProperty(array, it => it.age));

Answer 39

My below code will show the unique array of ages as well as new array not having duplicate age

var data = [
  {"name": "Joe", "age": 17}, 
  {"name": "Bob", "age": 17}, 
  {"name": "Carl", "age": 35}
];

var unique = [];
var tempArr = [];
data.forEach((value, index) => {
    if (unique.indexOf(value.age) === -1) {
        unique.push(value.age);
    } else {
        tempArr.push(index);    
    }
});
tempArr.reverse();
tempArr.forEach(ele => {
    data.splice(ele, 1);
});
console.log('Unique Ages', unique);
console.log('Unique Array', data);```

Answer 40

There is a library which provides strongly-typed, queryable collections in typescript.

The collections are:

• List
• Dictionary

The library is called ts-generic-collections .

Source code on GitHub:

https://github.com/VeritasSoftware/ts-generic-collections

You can get distinct values like below

  it('distinct', () => {
    let numbers: number[] = [1, 2, 3, 1, 3];
    let list = new List(numbers);

    let distinct = list.distinct(new EqualityComparer());

    expect(distinct.length == 3);
    expect(distinct.elementAt(0) == 1);
    expect(distinct.elementAt(1) == 2);
    expect(distinct.elementAt(2) == 3);
  });

  class EqualityComparer implements IEqualityComparer<number> {
    equals(x: number, y: number) : boolean {
      return x == y;
    }
  }

Answer 41

Answering this old question is pretty pointless, but there is a simple answer that speaks to the nature of Javascript. Objects in Javascript are inherently hash tables. We can use this to get a hash of unique keys:

var o = {}; array.map(function(v){ o[v.age] = 1; });

Then we can reduce the hash to an array of unique values:

var a2 = []; for (k in o){ a2.push(k); }

That is all you need. The array a2 contains just the unique ages.

Answer 42

 const array = [ { "name": "Joe", "age": 17 }, { "name":"Bob", "age":17 }, { "name":"Carl", "age": 35 } ] const allAges = array.map(a => a.age); const uniqueSet = new Set(allAges) const uniqueArray = [...uniqueSet] console.log(uniqueArray)

Answer 43

There is linq.js - LINQ for JavaScript package (npm install linq), that should be familiar for .Net developers.

Among others methods shown in samples there are distinct overloads.

An example to distinct objects by property value from an array of objects is

Enumerable.from(array).distinct(“$.id”).toArray();

From https://medium.com/@xmedeko/i-recommend-you-to-try-https-github-com-mihaifm-linq-20a4e3c090e9

Answer 44

I picked up random samples and tested it against the 100,000 items as below:

let array=[]
for (var i=1;i<100000;i++){

 let j= Math.floor(Math.random() * i) + 1
  array.push({"name":"Joe"+j, "age":j})
}

And here the performance result for each:

  Vlad Bezden Time:         === > 15ms
  Travis J Time: 25ms       === > 25ms 
  Niet the Dark Absol Time: === > 30ms
  Arun Saini Time:          === > 31ms
  Mrchief Time:             === > 54ms
  Ivan Nosov Time:          === > 14374ms

Also, I want to mention, since the items are generated randomly, the second place was iterating between Travis and Niet.

Answer 45

Let assume we have data something like this arr=[{id:1,age:17},{id:2,age:19} ...] , then we can find unique objects like this -

function getUniqueObjects(ObjectArray) {
    let uniqueIds = new Set();
    const list = [...new Set(ObjectArray.filter(obj => {
        if (!uniqueIds.has(obj.id)) {
            uniqueIds.add(obj.id);
            return obj;
        }
    }))];

    return list;
}

Check here Codepen Link

Answer 46

@Travis J dictionary answer in a Typescript type safety functional approach

const uniqueBy = <T, K extends keyof any>(
  list: T[] = [],
  getKey: (item: T) => K,
) => {
  return list.reduce((previous, currentItem) => {
    const keyValue = getKey(currentItem)
    const { uniqueMap, result } = previous
    const alreadyHas = uniqueMap[keyValue]
    if (alreadyHas) return previous
    return {
      result: [...result, currentItem],
      uniqueMap: { ...uniqueMap, [keyValue]: true }
    }
  }, { uniqueMap: {} as Record<K, any>, result: [] as T[] }).result
}

const array = [{ "name": "Joe", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 }, { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 }];

console.log(uniqueBy(array, el => el.age))

// [
//     {
//         "name": "Joe",
//         "age": 17
//     },
//     {
//         "name": "Carl",
//         "age": 35
//     }
// ]

Answer 47

unique(obj, prop) {
    let result = [];
    let seen = new Set();

    Object.keys(obj)
        .forEach((key) => {
            let value = obj[key];

            let test = !prop
                ? value
                : value[prop];

            !seen.has(test)
                && seen.add(test)
                && result.push(value);
        });

    return result;
}

Answer 48

I know this is an old and relatively well-answered question and the answer I'm giving will get the complete-object back (Which I see suggested in a lot of the comments on this post). It may be "tacky" but in terms of readability seems a lot cleaner (although less efficient) than a lot of other solutions.

This will return a unique array of the complete objects inside the array.

let productIds = data.map(d => { 
   return JSON.stringify({ 
      id    : d.sku.product.productId,
      name  : d.sku.product.name,
      price : `${d.sku.product.price.currency} ${(d.sku.product.price.gross / d.sku.product.price.divisor).toFixed(2)}`
   })
})
productIds = [ ...new Set(productIds)].map(d => JSON.parse(d))```

Answer 49

I wrote my own in TypeScript, for a generic case, like that in Kotlin's Array.distinctBy {} ...

function distinctBy<T, U extends string | number>(array: T[], mapFn: (el: T) => U) {
  const uniqueKeys = new Set(array.map(mapFn));
  return array.filter((el) => uniqueKeys.has(mapFn(el)));
}

Where U is hashable, of course. For Objects, you might need https://www.npmjs.com/package/es6-json-stable-stringify

Answer 50

Well you can use lodash to write a code which will be less verbose

Approach 1:Nested Approach

    let array = 
        [
            {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, 
            {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, 
            {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}
        ]
    let result = _.uniq(_.map(array,item=>item.age))

Approach 2: Method Chaining or Cascading method

    let array = 
        [
            {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, 
            {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, 
            {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}
        ]
    let result = _.chain(array).map(item=>item.age).uniq().value()

You can read about lodash's uniq() method from https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.15#uniq

Answer 51

The approach for getting a collection of distinct value from a group of keys.

You could take the given code from here and add a mapping for only the wanted keys to get an array of unique object values.

 const listOfTags = [{ id: 1, label: "Hello", color: "red", sorting: 0 }, { id: 2, label: "World", color: "green", sorting: 1 }, { id: 3, label: "Hello", color: "blue", sorting: 4 }, { id: 4, label: "Sunshine", color: "yellow", sorting: 5 }, { id: 5, label: "Hello", color: "red", sorting: 6 }], keys = ['label', 'color'], filtered = listOfTags.filter( (s => o => (k => !s.has(k) && s.add(k)) (keys.map(k => o[k]).join('|')) )(new Set) ) result = filtered.map(o => Object.fromEntries(keys.map(k => [k, o[k]]))); console.log(result);

 .as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

Answer 52

Using a set and filter. This preserves order:

 let unique = (items) => { const s = new Set(); return items.filter((item) => { if (s.has(item)) { return false; } s.add(item); return true; }); } console.log( unique( [ 'one', 'two', 'two', 'three', 'three', 'three' ] ) ); /* output: [ "one", "two", "three" ] */

Answer 53

If you're stuck using ES5, or you can't use new Set or new Map for some reason, and you need an array containing values with a unique key (and not just an array of unique keys), you can use the following:

function distinctBy(key, array) {
    var keys = array.map(function (value) { return value[key]; });
    return array.filter(function (value, index) { return keys.indexOf(value[key]) === index; });
}

Or the type-safe equivalent in TypeScript:

public distinctBy<T>(key: keyof T, array: T[]) {
    const keys = array.map(value => value[key]);
    return array.filter((value, index) => keys.indexOf(value[key]) === index);
}

Usage:

var distinctPeople = distinctBy('age', people);

All of the other answers either:

• Return an array of unique keys instead of objects (like returning the list of ages instead of the people who have an unique age);
• Use ES6, new Set , new Map etc. which might not be available to you;
• Do not have a configurable key (like having .age hardcoded into the distinct function);
• Assume the key can be used to index an array, which is not always true and TypeScript wouldn't allow it.

This answers does not have any of the four issues above.

Answer 54

If your array is object array, you can use this code.

getUniqueArray = (array: MyData[]) => {
    return array.filter((elem, index) => array.findIndex(obj => obj.value == elem.value) === index);
}

Where MyData is like as below:

export interface MyData{
    value: string,
    name: string
}

Note : You can't use Set because when objects are compared they are compared by reference and not by value. Therefore you need unique key for compare objects, in my example unique key is value field. For more details, you can visit this link : Filter an array for unique values in Javascript

Answer 55

 let mobilePhones = [{id: 1, brand: "B1"}, {id: 2, brand: "B2"}, {id: 3, brand: "B1"}, {id: 4, brand: "B1"}, {id: 5, brand: "B2"}, {id: 6, brand: "B3"}] let allBrandsArr = mobilePhones .map(row=>{ return row.brand; }); let uniqueBrands = allBrandsArr.filter((item, index, arry) => (arry.indexOf(item) === index)); console.log('uniqueBrands ', uniqueBrands );

Answer 56

Efficient and clean approach, using iter-ops library:

import {pipe, distinct, map} from 'iter-ops';

const array = 
    [
        {name: 'Joe', age: 17}, 
        {name: 'Bob', age: 17}, 
        {name: 'Carl', age: 35}
    ];

const i = pipe(
    array,
    distinct(a => a.age),
    map(m => m.age)
);

const uniqueAges = [...i]; //=> [17, 35]

Answer 57

Now we can Unique the Object on the base of same keys and same values

 const arr = [{"name":"Joe", "age":17},{"name":"Bob", "age":17}, {"name":"Carl", "age": 35},{"name":"Joe", "age":17}]
    let unique = []
     for (let char of arr) {
     let check = unique.find(e=> JSON.stringify(e) == JSON.stringify(char))
     if(!check) {
     unique.push(char)
     }
     }
    console.log(unique)

////outPut::: [{ name: "Joe", age: 17 }, { name: "Bob", age: 17 },{ name: "Carl", age: 35 }]

Answer 58

If you wanna iterate through unique items use this:
(more flexible version of https://stackoverflow.com/a/58429784/12496886 )

 const uniqBy = (arr, selector = (item) => item) => { const map = new Map(); arr.forEach((item) => { const prop = selector(item); if (.map.has(prop)) map,set(prop; item); }). return [...map;values()], } const uniqItems = uniqBy(array. (item) => item;age). console:log('uniqItems, '; uniqItems);

If you just need unique values use this:
(duplicate of https://stackoverflow.com/a/35092559/12496886 , just for completeness)

 const array = [ {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}, ]; const uniq = (items) => [...new Set(items)]; const uniqAges = uniq(array.map((item) => item.age)); console.log('uniqAges: ', uniqAges);

Answer 59

Presently working on a typescript library to query js objects in an orm fashion. You can download from the below link. This answer explains how to solve using the below library.

https://www.npmjs.com/package/@krishnadaspc/jsonquery?activeTab=readme

var ageArray = 
    [
        {"name":"Joe", "age":17}, 
        {"name":"Bob", "age":17}, 
        {"name":"Carl", "age": 35}
    ]

const ageArrayObj = new JSONQuery(ageArray)
console.log(ageArrayObj.distinct("age").get()) // outputs: [ { name: 'Bob', age: 17 }, { name: 'Carl', age: 35 } ]

console.log(ageArrayObj.distinct("age").fetchOnly("age")) // outputs: [ 17, 35 ]

Runkit live link: https://runkit.com/pckrishnadas88/639b5b3f8ef36f0008b17512

Answer 60

Clean Solution

export abstract class Serializable<T> {
  equalTo(t: Serializable<T>): boolean {
    return this.hashCode() === t.hashCode();
  }
  hashCode(): string {
    throw new Error('Not Implemented');
  }
}

export interface UserFields {
  firstName: string;
  lastName: string;
}

export class User extends Serializable<User> {
  constructor(private readonly fields: UserFields) {
    super();
  }
  override hashCode(): string {
    return `${this.fields.firstName},${this.fields.lastName}`;
  }
}

const list: User[] = [
  new User({ firstName: 'first', lastName: 'user' }),
  new User({ firstName: 'first', lastName: 'user' }),
  new User({ firstName: 'second', lastName: 'user' }),
  new User({ firstName: 'second', lastName: 'user' }),
  new User({ firstName: 'third', lastName: 'user' }),
  new User({ firstName: 'third', lastName: 'user' }),
];

/**
 * Let's create an map
 */
const userHashMap = new Map<string, User>();


/**
 * We are adding each user into the map using user's hashCode value
 */
list.forEach((user) => userHashMap.set(user.hashCode(), user));

/**
 * Then getting the list of users from the map,
 */
const uniqueUsers = [...userHashMap.values()];


/**
 * Let's print and see we did right?
 */
console.log(uniqueUsers.map((e) => e.hashCode()));

Answer 61

my two cents on this function:

var result = [];
for (var len = array.length, i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
  var age = array[i].age;
  if (result.indexOf(age) > -1) continue;
  result.push(age);
}

You can see the result here (Method 8) http://jsperf.com/distinct-values-from-array/3

Answer 62

Using new Ecma features are great but not all users have those available yet.

Following code will attach a new function named distinct to the Global Array object. If you are trying get distinct values of an array of objects, you can pass the name of the value to get the distinct values of that type.

Array.prototype.distinct = function(item){   var results = [];
for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++)
    if (!item){
        if (results.indexOf(this[i]) === -1)
            results.push(this[i]);
        } else {
        if (results.indexOf(this[i][item]) === -1)
            results.push(this[i][item]);
    }
return results;};

Check out my post in CodePen for a demo.

Answer 63

Just try

var x = [] ;
for (var i = 0 ; i < array.length ; i++)
{
 if(x.indexOf(array[i]['age']) == -1)
  {
    x.push(array[i]['age']);
  }
}
console.log(x);

Answer 64

If you would like to filter out duplicate values from an array on a known unique object property, you could use the following snippet:

let arr = [
  { "name": "Joe", "age": 17 },
  { "name": "Bob", "age": 17 },
  { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 },
  { "name": "Carl", "age": 35 }
];

let uniqueValues = [...arr.reduce((map, val) => {
    if (!map.has(val.name)) {
        map.set(val.name, val);
    }
    return map;
}, new Map()).values()]

Answer 65

this function can unique array and object

function oaunic(x,n=0){
    if(n==0) n = "elem";
    else n = "elem."+n;
    var uval = [];
    var unic = x.filter(function(elem, index, self){
        if(uval.indexOf(eval(n)) < 0){
            uval.push(eval(n));
            return index == self.indexOf(elem);
        }
    })
    return unic;
}

use that like this

tags_obj = [{name:"milad"},{name:"maziar"},{name:"maziar"}]
tags_arr = ["milad","maziar","maziar"]
console.log(oaunic(tags_obj,"name")) //for object
console.log(oaunic(tags_arr)) //for array

Answer 66

using d3.js v3 :

  ages = d3.set(
    array.map(function (d) { return d.age; })
  ).values();