I have a function template like this:
template <class ...A>
do_something()
{
// i'd like to do something to each A::var, where var has static storage
}
I can't use Boost.MPL
. Can you please show how to do this without recursion?
What Xeo said . To create a context for pack expansion I used the argument list of a function that does nothing ( dummy
):
#include <iostream>
#include <initializer_list>
template<class...A>
void dummy(A&&...)
{
}
template <class ...A>
void do_something()
{
dummy( (A::var = 1)... ); // set each var to 1
// alternatively, we can use a lambda:
[](...){ }((A::var = 1)...);
// or std::initializer list, with guaranteed left-to-right
// order of evaluation and associated side effects
auto list = {(A::var = 1)...};
}
struct S1 { static int var; }; int S1::var = 0;
struct S2 { static int var; }; int S2::var = 0;
struct S3 { static int var; }; int S3::var = 0;
int main()
{
do_something<S1,S2,S3>();
std::cout << S1::var << S2::var << S3::var;
}
This program prints 111
.
As an example, suppose you want to display each A::var. I see three ways to acomplish this as the code below illustrates.
Regarding option 2, notice that the order in which the elements are processed is not specified by the standard.
#include <iostream>
#include <initializer_list>
template <int i>
struct Int {
static const int var = i;
};
template <typename T>
void do_something(std::initializer_list<T> list) {
for (auto i : list)
std::cout << i << std::endl;
}
template <class... A>
void expand(A&&...) {
}
template <class... A>
void do_something() {
// 1st option:
do_something({ A::var... });
// 2nd option:
expand((std::cout << A::var << std::endl)...);
// 3rd option:
{
int x[] = { (std::cout << A::var << std::endl, 0)... };
(void) x;
}
}
int main() {
do_something<Int<1>, Int<2>, Int<3>>();
}
The answers above work -- here I explore a bit more on using a lambda for complex use cases.
Lambda 101: [ capture
]( params
){ code
}( args to call "in-place"
);
If you want to expand a lambda with a variadic template, it won't work as mentioned above when the parameters is of a non-trivial type:
error: cannot pass object of non-trivial type 'Foo' through variadic method; call will abort at runtime
error: cannot pass object of non-trivial type 'Foo' through variadic method; call will abort at runtime
.
The way to go is to move the code from the lambda's args
to code
:
template <class ...A>
do_something() {
Foo foo;
[&foo](var...){
foo.DoSomething(var);
}(A::var...);
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.