An example of what im trying to get:
String1 - 'string.co.uk' - would return 'string' and 'co.uk'
String2 - 'random.words.string.co.uk' - would return 'string` and 'co.uk'
I currently have this:
var split= [];
var tld_part = domain_name.split(".");
var sld_parts = domain_name.split(".")[0];
tld_part = tld_part.slice(1, tld_part.length);
split.push(sld_parts);
split.push(tld_part.join("."));
With my current code, it takes the split parameter from the beginning, i want to reverse it if possible. With my current code it does this:
String1 - 'string.co.uk' - returns 'string' and 'co.uk'
String2 - 'random.words.string.co.uk' - would return 'random` and 'words.string.co.uk'
Any suggestions?
To expand upon elclanrs comment:
function getParts(str) {
var temp = str.split('.').slice(-3) // grabs the last 3 elements
return {
tld_parts : [temp[1],temp[2]].join("."),
sld_parts : temp[0]
}
}
getParts("foo.bar.baz.co.uk")
would return { tld_parts : "co.uk", sld_parts : "baz" }
and
getParts("i.got.99.terms.but.a.bit.aint.one.co.uk")
would return { tld_parts : "co.uk", sld_parts : "one" }
One way that comes to mind is the following
var tld_part = domain_name.split(".");
var name = tld_part[tld_part.length - 2];
var tld = tld_part[tld_part.length - 1] +"."+ tld_part[tld_part.length];
try this
var str='string.co.uk'//or 'random.words.string.co.uk'
var part = str.split('.');
var result = part[part.length - 1].toString() + '.' + part[part.length - 1].toString();
alert(result);
Depending on your use case, peforming direct splits might not be a good idea — for example, how would the above code handle .com
or even just localhost
? In this respect I would go down the RegExp
route:
function stripSubdomains( str ){
var regs; return (regs = /([^.]+)(\.co)?(\.[^.]+)$/i.exec( str ))
? regs[1] + (regs[2]||'') + regs[3]
: str
;
};
Before the Regular Expression Police attack reprimand me for not being specific enough, a disclaimer:
The above can be tightened as a check against domain names by rather than checking for
^.
, to check for the specific characters allowed in a domain at that point. However, my own personal perspective on matters like these is to be more open at the point of capture, and be tougher from a filtering point at a later date... This allows you to keep an eye on what people might be trying, because you can never be 100% certain your validation isn't blocking valid requests — unless you have an army of user testers at your disposal . At the end of the day, it all depends on where this code is being used, so the above is an illustrated example only.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.