I would appreciate any help trying to find the cause of very slow return times on basic query table joins.
I was having trouble so I turned on Profiling and Query that took 19.7903 sec to return showed the following profile details:
Profiling
Status Time
starting 0.000044
Opening tables 0.000067
System lock 0.000002
Table lock 0.000006
init 0.000009
optimizing 0.000005
statistics 0.000011
preparing 0.000014
executing 0.000031
Sending data 0.000050
end 0.000004
end 0.000003
query end 0.000002
freeing items 0.000009
closing tables 0.000003
removing tmp table 0.000011
closing tables 0.000003
logging slow query 0.000002
cleaning up 0.000003
Showing rows 0 - 29 (2,200 total, Query took 19.7903 sec)
I don't understand why the profile times do not add up to "19.7903 sec".
The query was:
SELECT OWNER.ID OWNER_ID,
OWNER.LAST_NAME OWNER_LAST_NAME,
OWNER.FIRST_NAME OWNER_FIRST_NAME,
OWNER.PHONE_HOME_AREACODE OWNER_PHONE_HOME_AREACODE,
OWNER.PHONE_HOME_PREFIX OWNER_PHONE_HOME_PREFIX,
OWNER.PHONE_HOME_LINE_NUMBER OWNER_PHONE_HOME_LINE_NUMBER,
OWNER.PHONE_CELL_AREACODE OWNER_PHONE_CELL_AREACODE,
OWNER.PHONE_CELL_PREFIX OWNER_PHONE_CELL_PREFIX,
OWNER.PHONE_CELL_LINE_NUMBER OWNER_PHONE_CELL_LINE_NUMBER,
/*Some columns from OWNER removed for brevity*/
OWNER.CITY OWNER_CITY,
OWNER.PROVINCE OWNER_PROVINCE,
OWNER.POSTAL OWNER_POSTAL,
OWNER.NOTES OWNER_NOTES,
OWNER.REFERRED_BY OWNER_REFERRED_BY,
VISITOR.NAME VISITOR_NAME,
VISITOR.SIZE VISITOR_SIZE,
VISITOR.INACTIVE VISITOR_INACTIVE,
VISITOR.ID VISITOR_ID,
VISITOR.DELETED VISITOR_DELETED,
VACCINATIONS.CANINE_DISTEMPER_PARVOVIRUS_EXPIRES VACCINATIONS_CANINE_DISTEMPER_PARVOVIRUS_EXPIRES,
VACCINATIONS.CANINE_RABIES_EXPIRES VACCINATIONS_CANINE_RABIES_EXPIRES,
VACCINATIONS.CANINE_BORDETELLA_EXPIRES VACCINATIONS_CANINE_BORDETELLA_EXPIRES,
VACCINATIONS.FELINE_FVRCPC_EXPIRES VACCINATIONS_FELINE_FVRCPC_EXPIRES,
VACCINATIONS.FELINE_RABIES_EXPIRES VACCINATIONS_FELINE_RABIES_EXPIRES
FROM OWNER
LEFT JOIN VISITOR
ON VISITOR.OWNER_ID = OWNER.ID
LEFT JOIN VACCINATIONS
ON VACCINATIONS.VISITOR_ID = VISITOR.ID
ORDER BY VISITOR_NAME
Result of EXPLAIN:
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE OWNER ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 1483 Using temporary; Using filesort
1 SIMPLE VISITOR ref OWNER_ID OWNER_ID 4 wayDEV.OWNER.ID 1
1 SIMPLE VACCINATIONS ALL VISITOR_ID NULL NULL NULL 2059
INDEXES:
VISITOR:
Indexes: Documentation Keyname Type Cardinality Action Field
PRIMARY PRIMARY 2227 Edit Drop ID
NAME INDEX 2227 Edit Drop NAME
OWNER_ID INDEX 2227 Edit Drop OWNER_ID
OWNER:
Indexes: Documentation Keyname Type Cardinality Action Field
PRIMARY PRIMARY 1601 Edit Drop ID
LAST_NAME INDEX 1601 Edit Drop LAST_NAME
VACCINATIONS:
Indexes: Documentation Keyname Type Cardinality Action Field
PRIMARY PRIMARY 2131 Edit Drop ID
VISITOR_ID UNIQUE 2131 Edit Drop VISITOR_ID
BOARDING:
Indexes: Documentation Keyname Type Cardinality Action Field
PRIMARY PRIMARY 2256 Edit Drop ID
OWNER INDEX 2256 Edit Drop OWNER_ID
VISITOR INDEX 2256 Edit Drop VISITOR_ID
GROOMING:
Indexes: Documentation Keyname Type Cardinality Action Field
PRIMARY PRIMARY 2077 Edit Drop ID
VISITOR_ID UNIQUE 2077 Edit Drop VISITOR_ID
OWNER INDEX 2077 Edit Drop OWNER_ID
This query has performed fine for months. It is only recently and only intermittently that it comes back slow. About 20% of the time it will be slow. The rest of the time it returns just fine ( Showing rows 0 - 29 (2,200 total, Query took 0.0018 sec )). ? :\\
Could the fact that it is an intermittent problem indicate some problem other that the Query itself?? <<<<<<<
As I ask above... I don't understand why the profile times do not add up to "19.7903 sec".
Are the 'profile' time and the 'total, Query' time, to add up? <<<<<<<
Only a few thousand records in the entire database.
Any help would be appreciated. I'm on a Godaddy server.
(I understand that there could potentially be something wrong with my Query.. Or that it could be optimized. But I am asking some pretty specific questions here - noted by the... "<<<<<<<")
Honestly... We are talking about >>>>>>>20<<<<<<< seconds here! Surely this query on a 2000 record database should not be coming back 20 seconds???
The problem is that you order by a field from the second table in the LEFT JOIN. That is no index can actually be effifiently used for ordering, thus MySQL orders the rows with that whole lots of data in each row. The usual solution in MySQL to the query like this is to select only ids and do ordering within a subquery and then back join to the rest of the colums. This is especially the case when you do some paginagion as well (LIMIT shoul also be within the subquery).
You would need a composite covering index (owner_id, name) on VISITOR, and (visitor_id) on VACCINATIONS.
Now rewrite the query as following:
SELECT ...
FROM (
SELECT o.ID as o_ID, v.ID as v_ID
FROM OWNER o
LEFT JOIN VISITOR v ON o.ID = v.OWNER_ID
ORDER BY v.NAME
) ids
JOIN OWNER o ON o.ID = ids.o_ID
LEFT JOIN VISITOR v ON v.ID = ids.v_ID
LEFT JOIN VACCINATIONS v2 ON v2.VISITOR_ID = v.ID;
DATA TYPES FOR COLUMNS WERE NOT THE SAME - ie
OWNER.ID - DATA TYPE = (int7)
VISITOR.OWNER_ID - DATA TYPE = (int7)
VACCINATIONS.VISITOR_ID - DATA TYPE = (varchar7)
Setting the data type - for VACCINATIONS.VISITOR_ID - (int7)
, resolved the slowness - this table join on over 5000 records, is now as fast as any other MySQL call.
Thanks "GURU" http://forums.phpfreaks.com/topic/173475-left-join-extremely-slow-any-way-to-remedy-16000-lines/
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.