I'm trying to implement a pretty naive implementation of the command patern using generics
public abstract class Command {
}
public interface CommandHandler<H extends Command> {
boolean isActive();
void execute( H command );
}
public class CommandExecutionServiceImpl implements CommandExecutionService {
private Map< Class<Command>,CommandHandler<Command>> commandMap;
public CommandExecutionServiceImpl(){
commandMap = new HashMap<Class<Command>, CommandHandler<Command>>();
}
@Override
public void executeCommand(Command command) {
CommandHandler<Command> handler = commandMap.get(command.getClass());
handler.execute(command);
}
@Override
public boolean isActive(Command command) {
return false;
}
@Override
public <H extends Command> void addCommandHandler(Class<H> commandClass, CommandHandler<H> handler) {
commandMap.put( commandClass, handler );
}
Compiler fails with
Compilation failure CommandExecutionServiceImpl.java:[36,12] put(java.lang.Class,CommandHandler) in java.util.Map,CommandHandler> cannot be applied to (java.lang.Class,CommandHandler)
I can't understand why the compiler cannot infer the type at commandMap.put( commandClass, handler );
Any help would be appreciated.
It looks like you want a generic relationship between the keys and values of the map. If this were supported it might look like this:
private <H extends Command> Map<Class<H>, CommandHandler<H>> commandMap;
But that's obviously not allowed. A workaround is to use Josh Bloch's Typesafe Heterogeneous Container pattern:
private Map<Class<? extends Command>, CommandHandler<? extends Command>> commandMap;
@Override
public <H extends Command> void executeCommand(H command) {
// addCommandHandler guarantees the safety of this unchecked cast
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
CommandHandler<H> handler = (CommandHandler<H>)commandMap.get(command.getClass());
handler.execute(command);
}
Your map is declared:
Map< Class<Command>,CommandHandler<Command>>
but you try to put values of type:
Class<H> commandClass, CommandHandler<H> handler
where <H extends Command>
Perhaps you should add a generic type to the CommandExecutionService of type <T extends Command>
and declare the map as:
Map< Class<T>, CommandHandler<T>>
and the method:
public void addCommandHandler (Class<T> commandClass, CommandHandler<T> handler) { ... }
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.