My project configuration pom.xml contains:
<gae.version>1.8.6</gae.version>
And later on references the web.xml directly...
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<webXml>src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml</webXml>
<webResources>
<resource>
<directory>src/main/webapp/WEB-INF</directory>
<targetPath>WEB-INF</targetPath>
</resource>
</webResources>
</configuration>
</plugin>
....but my web.xml is empty because I'm using app.yaml to define my handlers. Can I remove this plugin element without any consequences? What about the maven-surefire-plugin?
Moving this out of comments (and with the benefit of coffee).
A few reasons to prefer appengine-web.xml
over app.yaml
if you're working with Java.
You'll get better tooling support. This is a weak reason at the moment, but as the tooling around App Engine grows, .xml
config will likely get the better support. I think you're running into one such case now.
If you're partially in the servlet world, or are working with people who are, web.xml
is a norm.
My experience is that that using app.yaml
limits your chances of getting help, because the pool of Java GAE users who also use app.yaml
is small. Caveat: There's probably some sampling bias here.
If you think you might want to move off of App Engine some day, say, onto RedHat's Cape Dwarf , I'm pretty sure they don't support app.yaml
. (Not that it would be a huge change.)
That said, if you have a simple use case and app.yaml
is working for you, stick with it. It is a supported option.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.