I have within my code that makes an $http.post
to a back end, and of course things can go wrong. If I use the below syntax within angular:
$http.post(url).success(function(data, status, headers, config))
.error(function(data, status, headers, config));
If there is an error, I can retrieve the error code using status
and handle it within the function defined in error()
. However, if instead I take this approach (which is the one I am in fact using):
var deferred = $q.defer();
$http.post(url).success(deferred.resolve).error(deferred.reject);
return deferred.promise;
With the second syntax, I have all of my ajax calls within a separate ServiceJS
directory, and can handle the successes or errors on a case by case basis. For instance, if the second snippet was Service.MyFunction()
then in the code where I need it I would:
Service.MyFunction().then(function() {},
function(data, status, headers, config) {});
However, if I use this code block, status
, headers
, config
are all undefined. My question is how can I retain this syntax but still retrieve the error code?
As an added reference, the back end is a C# Web API project, which would return errors using return BadRequest();
or the like.
Try something like this:
myFunction(){
var deferred = $q.defer();
// you can use .then() instead of .success or .error
$http.post(url).then(function(successResponse){
var data = successResponse.data;
var status = successResponse.status;
...
deferred.resolve(successResponse);
}, function(failureResponse){
var status = failureResponse.status;
var config = failureResponse.config;
...
deferred.reject(failureResponse);
});
return deferred.promise;
}
well, I'd say it's a good practice and more standard to implement a http interceptor and handle the HTTP errors from there intead of handling the error one by one on each http or resource object, and your code will be located in a single location.
basically, you can segment the actions to take depending on the error status you get for example:
angular.module('app').factory('myInterceptor', ['$q',
function($q){
return {
'responseError': function(rejection){
switch(rejection.status){
case 0:
//'No connection, is the internet down?'
break;
case 422:
// error
break;
case 484:
// error
break;
default:
// message rejection.status, rejection.statusText
break;
}
return $q.reject(rejection);
}
};
}
]);
$http
is already returning a promise, so why not use that one?
function myFunction() {
return $http.post(url);
}
// ...
myFunction().success(function(data, status, headers, config) {
// ...
});
... or ...
myFunction().then(...);
The promises returned from $http
have the methods success
and error
in addition to the other promise methods. Read more at Angular docs for $http .
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.