简体   繁体   中英

Winpcap - pcap_next_ex vs pcap_loop

I have a question, Imagine I have a thread which captures packets and process them itself.

With pcap_next_ex : I would use a loop and I would process the packets in each interaction, suppose I call Sleep(200) to simulate the stuff. With pcap_next_ex I would arrive a moment when I would lose packets.

With pcap_loop : I would use a callback to a packet handler for each packet incoming it would work like an event. In the packet handler I would treat the packets and suppose I call Sleep(200) to simulate the stuff. Would I lose packets?.

Yes.

pcap_next_ex and pcap_loop call the same internal function that reads a packet from the ring buffer. The difference is only that the former return the packet but the latter calls a callback with the packet.

pcap_loop calls the callback in the same thread as one called the pcap_loop , and waits for the callback to complete its task before reading the next packet. So, if the callback takes a long time, the pcap_loop cannot read packets enough frequently, which results in more possibility to lose packets.

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM