I have two examples, which of these two is better and why? In both cases, I got the same result. I have chosen container simply to hold strings.
Example 1:
char *c_ptr[] = {};
int num;
if (fill_array(c_ptr, &num) != 0) {
cout << "Error" << endl;
}
for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {
cout << "Str[" << i << "] = " << c_ptr[i] << endl;
}
// free pointer..
// Function implementation
int fill_array(char *c_ptr[], int *count) {
vector<string> v = {"haha", "hehe", "omg", "happy, learning!"};
*count = v.size();
int i = 0;
for (vector<string>::iterator it = v.begin(); it != v.end(); it++, i++) {
c_ptr[i] = (char*)malloc((*it).size() + 1);
strncpy(c_ptr[i], (*it).c_str(),(*it).size() + 1);
}
return 0;
}
Example 2:
char **c_ptr = NULL;
int num;
if (fill_array(&c_ptr, &num) != 0) {
cout << "Error" << endl;
}
for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {
cout << "Str[" << i << "] = " << c_ptr[i] << endl;
}
// free double pointer..
// Function implementation
int fill_array(char ***c_ptr, int *num) {
vector<string> v = {"haha", "hehe", "omg", "happy, learning!"};
*num = v.size();
int i = 0;
*c_ptr = (char **)malloc(*num * sizeof(char *));
for (vector<string>::iterator it = v.begin(); it != v.end(); it++, i++) {
c_ptr[i] = (char*)malloc((*it).size() + 1);
strncpy(*c_ptr[i], (*it).c_str(),(*it).size() + 1);
}
return 0;
}
Result :
Str[0] = haha
Str[1] = hehe
Str[2] = omg
Str[3] = happy, learning!
Also What is the use of empty bracket in array? Is it good programming habit vs dynamic allocation?
** is pointer to a pointer or simply we can say it a double pointer.
Double pointers are better to use when we are passing a pointer variable from main() or simply a function to another function.
By looking at your code, I would like to suggest you one thing and that is, avoid using global variables.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.