While experimenting with bash arrays, I stumbled upon behaviour I find hard to explain.
> arr=("a" "b")
> bash -c "echo ${arr[*]}"
a b
> bash -c "echo ${arr[@]}"
a
The relevant part of the bash manual states:
${!name[@]}, ${!name[*]} : If name is an array variable, expands to the list of array indices (keys) assigned in name. [...] When '@' is used and the expansion appears within double quotes, each key expands to a separate word.
As I understand it, I would expect the latter example to expand from bash -c "echo ${arr[@]}"
to bash -c "echo \\"a\\" \\"b\\""
(or even bash -c "echo ab"
) and output ab
in the subshell.
So, which is the correct behaviour? The observed behaviour? The behaviour I expect? Or something entirely different?
You can run the code under set -xv
to see how bash expands the variables:
choroba@triangle:~ $ (set -xv ; arr=("a" "b") ; bash -c "echo ${arr[@]}")
+ arr=("a" "b")
+ bash -c 'echo a' b
a
"echo ${arr[@]}"
is expanded to two words, echo a
and b
, the first one is used as a command to run, the second one is interpreted as the value for the $0
or name of the shell. Any following arguments would be used to set the positional parameters.
"echo ${arr[@]}"
expands to two words, echo a
, and b
. And the manual also says
If the -c option is present, then commands are read from the first non-option argument command_string. If there are arguments after the command_string, the first argument is assigned to $0 and any remaining arguments are assigned to the positional parameters. The assignment to $0 sets the name of the shell, which is used in warning and error messages.
So, you're assigning b
to $0
there.
Proof of concept:
$ arr=(a b)
$ bash -c "echo \$0; echo ${arr[@]}"
b
a
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.