I am generating a Flux from a series of blocking REST API calls, each call depends on the result of previous call. ie
Result r1 = call(fromRow = 0);
Result r2 = call(fromRow = 0 + r1.size());
Result r3 = call(fromRow = 0 + r1.size() + r2.size());
...
Here is a simplified version of what I am trying with:
Flux.generate(() -> 0, (i, sink) -> {
Result r = slowRemoteCall(i);
if (r == null) {
sink.complete();
} else {
sink.next(r)
}
return i + r.size();
}, state -> {});
Just wonder will the blocking call slowRemoteCall
inside the state generator become a problem?
Thank you for your help in advance!
With expand
operator and a reactive remote client (eg: Spring WebClient) you can implement this in a reactive non-blocking way:
slowRemoteCall(0)
.expand(result -> {
if (result.size() == 0) { // stop condition
return Mono.empty();
} else {
return slowRemoteCall(result.startIndex() + result.size()); // maintain state
}
})
Mono<Result> slowRemoteCall(int startIndex) {
// simulate latency (could be a WebClient call here)
return Mono.delay(Duration.ofMillis(200)).thenReturn(new Result(startIndex));
}
Inspired by this blog post .
It may become a problem! If you have any blocking call, you can use schedulers
to get the task done by specific thread pools.
Flux.generate(.........)
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.boundedElastic())
More info:
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.