What is the best way to communicate between JavaScript and Actionscript 2.0 and 3.0
Question
What about support for major browser? IE 6+. FF 2+, Opera 9+, Safari 3+, Google Chrome? It is good idea to use actionscript to generate graphics (interface developed in JS and standard HTML forms)? Maybe its better to use canvas? What about performance?
2 answers
solution1
2 2010-02-01 23:05:22
我将从flash.external.ExternalInterface对象开始。
solution2
0 2010-02-02 08:21:40
-
ExternalInterfaceis AS3 specific. For AS2, use fscommand . I can't vouch for it though, as I haven't worked in AS2. As for AS3, I've usedExternalInterfacesuccessfully in FF(3+), IE(8) and Chrome. Haven't heard anything about it not working in other browsers either. - As opposed to using Flash for the whole form? Yeah, that way the form will be accessible to users who don't have flash too.
- Given that you're targeted browsers include IE-6 et al, Canvas is hardly an option. According to the linked article, no version of IE supports canvas yet. Even FF started supporting it from FF3.
- About performance, its hard to say without knowing what you are trying to do.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.
Related Question
What is the best way to communicate and pass data between child polymer elements?
What's the best way to communicate PHP settings to Javascript?
What is the easiest way to communicate between Javascript web script to an Erlang server
What is the best way to communicate between a node.js server and a C# client?
Javascript to Actionscript 2.0
What are the key differences between JavaScript and ActionScript 3?
Actionscript 3.0 calling Javascript not working?
Interacting with actionscript 3.0 using javascript
Best way to communicate between node.js and java on the same host
What is the best way for SPAs to communicate data to node server?
Related Tags