Is returning a string literal address from a function safe and portable?

Question

I need a function to return a string that will only be accessed read-only. The string contents is known at compile time so that I will use a string literal anyway.

I can return something like std::string :

std::string myFunction()
{
   return "string";
}

or return const char* :

const char* myFunction()
{
   return "string";
}

Is the second alternative safe and portable in this scenario?

Answer 1

Is the second alternative safe and portable in this scenario?

Yes! The storage allocation of string literals is static and they persist for the lifetime of the application.

Answer 2

Yes! But beware of this potential gotcha:

char * myFunc() {
    return "Constant string?";
}

Yes, you can convert a string literal to a non-const char * ! This will enable you to later break the world by trying to modify the contents of that char * . This "feature" exists for legacy reasons -- string literals are older than const, and were originally defined as char * in C.

g++ throws out an obnoxious warning for this, even in the default mode, thankfully. I don't know if VC++ throws out a warning just as eagerly.

Answer 3

Yes. (It isn't different of storing such pointer in a global data structure).