In the program below, is the line
Derived(double y): Base(), y_(y)
correct/allowed? That is, does it follow ANSI rules?
#include <iostream>
class Base
{
public:
Base(): x_(0)
{
std::cout << "Base default constructor called" << std::endl;
}
Base(int x): x_(x)
{
std::cout << "Base constructor called with x = " << x << std::endl;
}
void display() const
{
std::cout << x_ << std::endl;
}
protected:
int x_;
};
class Derived: public Base
{
public:
Derived(): Base(1), y_(1.2)
{
std::cout << "Derived default constructor called" << std::endl;
}
Derived(double y): Base(), y_(y)
{
std::cout << "Derived constructor called with y = " << y << std::endl;
}
void display() const
{
std::cout << Base::x_ << ", " << y_ << std::endl;
}
private:
double y_;
};
int main()
{
Base b1;
b1.display();
Derived d1;
d1.display();
std::cout << std::endl;
Base b2(-9);
b2.display();
Derived d2(-8.7);
d2.display();
return 0;
}
It's allowed, but it's pointless, as the compiler will make the call for you. I'm afraid I don't feel like doing a Standard trawl this morning, though.
This is correct but calls to the base class default constructors are not necessary. Assuming you are using g++, you may want to use the following flag: -ansi (<=> -std=c++98)
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.