Wait for any event of multiple events simultaneously in F#

Question

In F# I know how to wait asynchronously for one event using Async.AwaitEvent :

let test = async {
  let! move = Async.AwaitEvent(form.MouseMove)
  ...handle move... }

Suppose I want to wait for either the MouseMove or the KeyDown event. I'd like to have something like this:

let! moveOrKeyDown = Async.AwaitEvent(form.MouseMove, form.KeyDown)

This function doesn't exist but is there another way to do this?

Answer 1

I used an implementation of a method that you use in your sample in the talk about reactive programming that I had in London (there is a download link at the bottom of the page). If you're interested in this topic, you may find the talk useful as well :-).

The version I'm using takes IObservable instead of IEvent (so the name of the method is AwaitObservable ). There are some serious memory leaks when using Event.merge (and other combinators from the Event module) together with AwaitEvent , so you should use Observable.merge etc. and AwaitObservable instead.

The problem is described in more detail here (see Section 3 for a clear example). Briefly - when you use Event.merge , it attaches a handler to the source event (eg MouseDown ), but it does not remove the handler after you finish waiting using AwaitEvent , so the event is never removed - if you keep waiting in a loop coded using asynchronous workflow, you keep adding new handlers (that do not do anything when run).

A simple correct solution (based on what desco posted) would look like this:

let rec loop () = async {
  let e1 = f.KeyDown |> Observable.map Choice1Of2
  let e2 = f.MouseMove |> Observable.map Choice2Of2
  let! evt = Observable.merge e1 e2 |> Async.AwaitObservable
  // ...
  return! loop() } // Continue looping

BTW: You may also want to look at this article (based on chapter 16 from my book).

Answer 2

let ignoreEvent e = Event.map ignore e

let merged = Event.merge (ignoreEvent f.KeyDown) (ignoreEvent f.MouseMove)
Async.AwaitEvent merged

EDIT: another version that preserves original types

let merged = Event.merge (f.KeyDown |> Event.map Choice1Of2) (f.MouseMove |> Event.map Choice2Of2)
Async.AwaitEvent merged

EDIT 2 : according to comments of Tomas Petricek

let e1 = f.KeyDown |> Observable.map Choice1Of2
let e2 = f.MouseMove |> Observable.map Choice2Of2
let! evt = Observable.merge e1 e2 |> Async.AwaitObservable

AwaitObservable primitive can be taken from here ('Reactive demos in Silverlight' by Tomas Petricek).

Answer 3

In the interest of understanding what's going on I looked up the source code to Event.map, Event.merge and Choice.

type Choice<'T1,'T2> = 
    | Choice1Of2 of 'T1 
    | Choice2Of2 of 'T2

[<CompiledName("Map")>]
let map f (w: IEvent<'Delegate,'T>) =
    let ev = new Event<_>() 
    w.Add(fun x -> ev.Trigger(f x));
    ev.Publish

[<CompiledName("Merge")>]
let merge (w1: IEvent<'Del1,'T>) (w2: IEvent<'Del2,'T>) =
    let ev = new Event<_>() 
    w1.Add(fun x -> ev.Trigger(x));
    w2.Add(fun x -> ev.Trigger(x));
    ev.Publish

This means our solution is creating 3 new events.

async {
    let merged = Event.merge 
                     (f.KeyDown |> Event.map Choice1Of2) 
                     (f.MouseMove |> Event.map Choice2Of2)
    let! move = Async.AwaitEvent merged
}

We could reduce this to one event by making a tightly coupled version of this library code.

type EventChoice<'T1, 'T2> = 
    | EventChoice1Of2 of 'T1
    | EventChoice2Of2 of 'T2
    with 
    static member CreateChoice (w1: IEvent<_,'T1>) (w2: IEvent<_,'T2>) =
        let ev = new Event<_>()
        w1.Add(fun x -> ev.Trigger(EventChoice1Of2 x))
        w2.Add(fun x -> ev.Trigger(EventChoice2Of2 x))
        ev.Publish

And here is our new code.

async {
    let merged = EventChoice.CreateChoice form.MouseMove form.KeyDown
    let! move = Async.AwaitEvent merged
}

Answer 4

You can use a combination of Event.map and Event.merge :

let eventOccurs e = e |> Event.map ignore
let mouseOrKey = Event.merge (eventOccurs frm.MouseMove) (eventOccurs frm.KeyDown)

Then you can use Async.AwaitEvent with this new event. If MouseMove and KeyDown had the same type, you could skip the Event.map step and just directly merge them.

EDIT

But at Tomas points out, you should use the Observable combinators in preference to the Event ones.