How do you find the sum of all the numbers in an array in Java?

Question

I'm having a problem finding the sum of all of the integers in an array in Java. I cannot find any useful method in the Math class for this.

Answer 1

In java-8 you can use streams:

int[] a = {10,20,30,40,50};
int sum = IntStream.of(a).sum();
System.out.println("The sum is " + sum);

Output:

The sum is 150.

It's in the package java.util.stream

import java.util.stream.*;

Answer 2

If you're using Java 8, theArrays class provides a stream(int[] array) method which returns a sequential IntStream with the specified int array. It has also been overloaded for double and long arrays.

int [] arr = {1,2,3,4};
int sum = Arrays.stream(arr).sum(); //prints 10

It also provides a method stream(int[] array, int startInclusive, int endExclusive) which permits you to take a specified range of the array (which can be useful) :

int sum = Arrays.stream(new int []{1,2,3,4}, 0, 2).sum(); //prints 3

Finally, it can take an array of type T . So you can per example have a String which contains numbers as an input and if you want to sum them just do :

int sum = Arrays.stream("1 2 3 4".split("\\s+")).mapToInt(Integer::parseInt).sum();

Answer 3

This is one of those simple things that doesn't (AFAIK) exist in the standard Java API. It's easy enough to write your own.

Other answers are perfectly fine, but here's one with some for-each syntactic sugar.

int someArray[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
int sum = 0;

for (int i : someArray)
    sum += i;

Also, an example of array summation is even shown in the Java 7 Language Specification . The example is from Section 10.4 - Array Access .

class Gauss {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int[] ia = new int[101];
        for (int i = 0; i < ia.length; i++) ia[i] = i;
        int sum = 0;
        for (int e : ia) sum += e;
        System.out.println(sum);
    }
}

Answer 4

You can't. Other languages have some methods for this like array_sum() in PHP, but Java doesn't.

Just..

int[] numbers = {1,2,3,4};
int sum = 0;
for( int i : numbers) {
    sum += i;
}

System.out.println(sum);

Answer 5

在 Apache Math 中：有StatUtils.sum(double[] arr)

Answer 6

The only point I would add to previous solutions is that I would use a long to accumulate the total to avoid any overflow of value.

int[] someArray = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Integer.MAX_VALUE};
long sum = 0;

for (int i : someArray)
    sum += i;

Answer 7

In Java 8

Code :

   int[] array = new int[]{1,2,3,4,5};
   int sum = IntStream.of(array).reduce( 0,(a, b) -> a + b);
   System.out.println("The summation of array is " + sum);

  System.out.println("Another way to find summation :" + IntStream.of(array).sum());

Output :

The summation of array is 15
Another way to find summation :15

Explanation :

In Java 8 , you can use reduction concept to do your addition.

Read all about Reduction

Answer 8

int sum = 0;

for (int i = 0; i < yourArray.length; i++)
{
  sum = sum + yourArray[i];
}

Answer 9

IMHO a sum function would seem a good fit to extend the Arrays class where fill, sort, search, copy, & equals live. There are a lot of handy methods hiding in the javadocs so it is a fair question when porting Fortran to java to ask before rolling our own helper method. Search through the huge javadoc index for "sum", "add" and any other keyword you might think of. You might suspect certainly someone has already done this for primitive types int, float, double, Integer, Float, Double? No matter how simple, it is always good to check. Keep the code as simple as possible and don't reinvent the wheel.

Answer 10

int sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++)
  sum += myArray[i];
}

Answer 11

A bit surprised to see None of the above answers considers it can be multiple times faster using a thread pool. Here, parallel uses a fork-join thread pool and automatically break the stream in multiple parts and run them parallel and then merge. If you just remember the following line of code you can use it many places.

So the award for the fastest short and sweet code goes to -

int[] nums = {1,2,3};
int sum =  Arrays.stream(nums).parallel().reduce(0, (a,b)-> a+b);

Lets say you want to do sum of squares , then Arrays.stream(nums).parallel().map(x->x*x).reduce(0, (a,b)-> a+b). Idea is you can still perform reduce , without map .

Answer 12

It depends. How many numbers are you adding? Testing many of the above suggestions:

import java.text.NumberFormat;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Locale;

public class Main {

    public static final NumberFormat FORMAT = NumberFormat.getInstance(Locale.US);

    public static long sumParallel(int[] array) {
        final long start = System.nanoTime();
        int sum = Arrays.stream(array).parallel().reduce(0,(a,b)->  a + b);
        final long end = System.nanoTime();
        System.out.println(sum);
        return  end - start;
    }

    public static long sumStream(int[] array) {
        final long start = System.nanoTime();
        int sum = Arrays.stream(array).reduce(0,(a,b)->  a + b);
        final long end = System.nanoTime();
        System.out.println(sum);
        return  end - start;
    }

    public static long sumLoop(int[] array) {
        final long start = System.nanoTime();
        int sum = 0;
        for (int v: array) {
            sum += v;
        }
        final long end = System.nanoTime();
        System.out.println(sum);
        return  end - start;
    }

    public static long sumArray(int[] array) {
        final long start = System.nanoTime();
        int sum = Arrays.stream(array) .sum();
        final long end = System.nanoTime();
        System.out.println(sum);
        return  end - start;
    }

    public static long sumStat(int[] array) {
        final long start = System.nanoTime();
        int sum = 0;
        final long end = System.nanoTime();
        System.out.println(sum);
        return  end - start;
    }


    public static void test(int[] nums) {
        System.out.println("------");
        System.out.println(FORMAT.format(nums.length) + " numbers");
        long p = sumParallel(nums);
        System.out.println("parallel " + FORMAT.format(p));
        long s = sumStream(nums);
        System.out.println("stream " +  FORMAT.format(s));
        long ar = sumArray(nums);
        System.out.println("arrays " +  FORMAT.format(ar));
        long lp = sumLoop(nums);
        System.out.println("loop " +  FORMAT.format(lp));

    }

    public static void testNumbers(int howmany) {
        int[] nums = new int[howmany];
        for (int i =0; i < nums.length;i++) {
            nums[i] = (i + 1)%100;
        }
        test(nums);
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        testNumbers(3);
        testNumbers(300);
        testNumbers(3000);
        testNumbers(30000);
        testNumbers(300000);
        testNumbers(3000000);
        testNumbers(30000000);
        testNumbers(300000000);
    }
}

I found, using an 8 core, 16 G Ubuntu18 machine, the loop was fastest for smaller values and the parallel for larger. But of course it would depend on the hardware you're running:

------
3 numbers
6
parallel 4,575,234
6
stream 209,849
6
arrays 251,173
6
loop 576
------
300 numbers
14850
parallel 671,428
14850
stream 73,469
14850
arrays 71,207
14850
loop 4,958
------
3,000 numbers
148500
parallel 393,112
148500
stream 306,240
148500
arrays 335,795
148500
loop 47,804
------
30,000 numbers
1485000
parallel 794,223
1485000
stream 1,046,927
1485000
arrays 366,400
1485000
loop 459,456
------
300,000 numbers
14850000
parallel 4,715,590
14850000
stream 1,369,509
14850000
arrays 1,296,287
14850000
loop 1,327,592
------
3,000,000 numbers
148500000
parallel 3,996,803
148500000
stream 13,426,933
148500000
arrays 13,228,364
148500000
loop 1,137,424
------
30,000,000 numbers
1485000000
parallel 32,894,414
1485000000
stream 131,924,691
1485000000
arrays 131,689,921
1485000000
loop 9,607,527
------
300,000,000 numbers
1965098112
parallel 338,552,816
1965098112
stream 1,318,649,742
1965098112
arrays 1,308,043,340
1965098112
loop 98,986,436

Answer 13

I like this method personally. My code style is a little weird.

public static int sumOf(int... integers) {
    int total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < integers.length; total += integers[i++]);
    return total;
}

Pretty easy to use in code:

int[] numbers = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
sumOf(1);
sumOf(1, 2, 3);
sumOf(numbers);

Answer 14

I use this:

public static long sum(int[] i_arr)
{
    long sum;
    int i;
    for(sum= 0, i= i_arr.length - 1; 0 <= i; sum+= i_arr[i--]);
    return sum;
}

Answer 15

You have to roll your own.
You start with a total of 0. Then you consider for every integer in the array, add it to a total. Then when you're out of integers, you have the sum.

If there were no integers, then the total is 0.

Answer 16

There are two things to learn from this exercise :

You need to iterate through the elements of the array somehow - you can do this with a for loop or a while loop. You need to store the result of the summation in an accumulator. For this, you need to create a variable.

int accumulator = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++) {
    accumulator += myArray[i];
}

Answer 17

You can make your code look better like this:

public void someMethod(){
    List<Integer> numbers = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    numbers.addAll(db.findNumbers());
    ...
    System.out.println("Result is " + sumOfNumbers(numbers));
}

private int sumOfNumbers(List<Integer> numbers){
    int sum = 0;
    for (Integer i : numbers){
      sum += i;
    }
    return sum;
}

Answer 18

There is a sum() method in underscore-java library.

Code example:

import com.github.underscore.lodash.U;

public class Main {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int sum = U.sum(java.util.Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4));

        System.out.println(sum);
        // -> 10
    }
}

Answer 19

Use below logic:

static int sum()
     {
         int sum = 0; // initialize sum
         int i;

         // Iterate through all elements summing them up
         for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
            sum +=  arr[i];

         return sum;
     }

Answer 20

I have the right solution for your problem if you specifically have an array of type double, then this method can be used to calculate the sum of its elements. also, it using math class

import org.apache.commons.math3.stat.StatUtils;
 
public class ArraySum {
 
   public static void main(String[] args) {
    double[] array = { 10, 4, 17, 33, -2, 14 };
    int sum = (int)StatUtils.sum(array);
    System.out.println("Sum of array elements is: " + sum);
   }
}

Answer 21

class Addition {

     public static void main() {
          int arr[]={5,10,15,20,25,30};         //Declaration and Initialization of an Array
          int sum=0;                            //To find the sum of array elements
          for(int i:arr) {
              sum += i;
          }
          System.out.println("The sum is :"+sum);//To display the sum 
     }
} 

Answer 22

There is no 'method in a math class' for such thing. Its not like its a square root function or something like that.

You just need to have a variable for the sum and loop through the array adding each value you find to the sum.

Answer 23

We may use user defined function. At first initialize sum variable equal to zero. Then traverse the array and add element with sum . Then update the sum variable.

Code Snippet :

import java.util.*;   
import java.lang.*;  
import java.io.*;


class Sum
{
    public static int sum(int arr[])
    {
        int sum=0;

        for(int i=0; i<arr.length; i++)
        {
            sum += arr[i];
        }
        return sum;
    }

    public static void main (String[] args)
    {
          int arr[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};

          int total = sum(arr);

          System.out.printf("%d", total);
    }
}

Answer 24

/**
 * Sum of all elements from 1 to 1000
 */
final int sum = Stream.iterate(1, n -> n + 1).limit(1000).mapToInt(el -> el).sum();

Answer 25

Most of the answers here are using inbuilt functions-
Here is my answer if you want to know the whole logic behind this ques:

import java.util.*;

public class SumOfArray {
    public static void main(String[] args){
        Scanner inp = new Scanner(System.in);
        int n = inp.nextInt();
        int[] arr = new int[n];
        for(int i = 0; i < n; i++){
            arr[i] = inp.nextInt();
        }
        System.out.println("The sum of the array is :" + sum(arr));
    }
    static int sum(int[] arr){
        int sum = 0;
        for (int a = 0; a < arr.length; a++){
            sum = sum + arr[a];
        }
        return sum;
    }
}

Answer 26

 public class Num1
 {
     public static void main ()
     {
          //Declaration and Initialization
          int a[]={10,20,30,40,50}

          //To find the sum of array elements
          int sum=0;
          for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
          {
              sum=sum+i;
          }

          //To display the sum
          System.out.println("The sum is :"+sum);

     }
  } 

Answer 27

public class AddDemo {

    public static void main(String[] args) {

        ArrayList <Integer>A = new ArrayList<Integer>();

        Scanner S = new Scanner(System.in);

        System.out.println("Enter the Numbers: ");

        for(int i=0; i<5; i++){

            A.add(S.nextInt());
        }

        System.out.println("You have entered: "+A);

        int Sum = 0;

        for(int i=0; i<A.size(); i++){

            Sum = Sum + A.get(i);

        }

        System.out.println("The Sum of Entered List is: "+Sum);

    }

}

Answer 28

As of Java 8 The use of lambda expressions have become available.

See this:

int[] nums = /** Your Array **/;

Compact:

int sum = 0;
Arrays.asList(nums).stream().forEach(each -> {
    sum += each;
});

Prefer:

int sum = 0;

ArrayList<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();

for (int each : nums) { //refer back to original array
     list.add(each); //there are faster operations…
}

list.stream().forEach(each -> {
    sum += each;
});

Return or print sum.