QObject Multiple Inheritance

Question

I am trying to use mix in classes for C++/Qt to provide a whole bunch of widgets with a common interface. The interface is defined in such as way so that if it is defined as the base class for other widget classes, then the widget themselves will have those signals:

class SignalInterface: public QObject {
    Q_OBJECT

    public:
    SignalInterface();
    virtual ~SignalInterface();

    signals:
    void iconChanged(QIcon);
    void titleChanged(QString);
}

class Widget1: public SignalInterface, QWidget{

    public:
    Widget1()
    virtual ~Widget1()

    // The Widget Should Inherit the signals
}

Looking at the class hierarchy the problem becomes apparent, I have stumbled on to the dreaded diamond in multiple inheritance, where the Widget1 inherits from QWidget and SignalInterface , and both which inherit from QObject . Will this cause any issues?

We know that this problem can be easily solved if the QObject class is pure virtual (which is not the case).

A possible solution would be:

class Interface: public QWidget {
Q_OBJECT

signals:
void IconChanged(QIcon);
void titleChanged(QString);
}

class Widget1: public Interface {

}

The issue here is that I already have lot of code that inherit from QWidget , and its painful to hack that in. Is there another way?

Answer 1

Unfortunately inheriting QObject twice will cause problems in moc .

From http://qt-project.org :

If you are using multiple inheritance, moc assumes that the first inherited class is a subclass of QObject . Also, be sure that only the first inherited class is a QObject .

I would suggest using something more like the delegate pattern, or recreate with a HasA not a IsA relationship.

Answer 2

Qt allows multiple inheritance if the base class inherits privately from QObject.

Example:

class Base: private QObject {
   Q_OBJECT
   /*Can use signals and slots like any other QObject-derived class*/
};

class Derived1: public Base {
   /*Cannot use signals/slots because it does not "see" that Base inherits from QObject*/
};

class Derived2: public QWidget, public Base {
   Q_OBJECT
   /*Can use signals/slots plus has all the functionality of QWidget and Base*/
};

Of course, private inheritance is a different animal altogether and may not give you the solution you really need. What I use it for is when I can get away with using signals/slots only in the base class. When I really do need QObject behavior in a derived class, I inherit from QObject specifically for just that class.

Answer 3

Why using inheritance , why not composition ? For example, you can rewrite your case the next way:

class IMyWidgetSignals : public QObject
{
    Q_OBJECT
signals:
    void iconChanged(QIcon);
    void titleChanged(QString);
};

//------------------------------------------------------------------------------

class IMyWidget {
public:
    IMyWidget () {}
    // virtual functions:
    // ...
    
    IMyWidgetSignals _signals;
};


//------------------------------------------------------------------------------

class Widget1: public QWidget, public IMyWidget
{
public:
    using QWidget::QWidget;
}
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------

int main(...)
{
    
    Widget1 w1;
    w1.show();

    QObject::connect(&w1._signals, &IMyWidgetSignals::iconChanged, [] (const auto &icon) { 
        // ... do smth with icon
    });
}