I made the following mistake:
Executors.newFixedThreadThreadPool
to make a pool Callable
objects, such that the call
method in turn tried to start a task on the very same thread pool invokeAll
The results were a deadlock on the queue of the executor service.
The Javadoc I've read doesn't appear to prohibit this set of activities. Did I miss something? Is there some way to customize the queue or the service so that this could work?
My understanding of your question is something like the following test-case, which works as documented (as you say) and I've happily used in production. How does your example differ from this?
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
class Scratch {
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(1);
pool.submit(new Callable<Void>() {
@Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
pool.submit(new Callable<Void>() {
@Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
System.out.println(new Date() + ": Second callable being run.");
pool.shutdown();
return null;
}
});
System.out.println(new Date() + ": First callable going to sleep...");
Thread.sleep(2000);
System.out.println(new Date() + ": First callable finished!");
return null;
}
});
pool.awaitTermination(2, TimeUnit.MINUTES);
}
}
Prints something like:
Mon Feb 20 01:18:00 GMT 2012: First callable going to sleep...
Mon Feb 20 01:18:02 GMT 2012: First callable finished!
Mon Feb 20 01:18:02 GMT 2012: Second callable being run.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.