简体   繁体   中英

difference between jstats and jmx in visualvm

I am using visualvm to monitor my production server which has both jmx and jstatd.

I tried both protocol in visual vm but seems very identical, is there any difference using jmx or jstatd to monitor a server (in term of monitoring possibility, bandwith usage, cpu usage , etc...) ?

Should I prefer one solution over another ?

thanks !

JMX does not allow detailed 'jstat' monitoring details as required by several plugins in 'VisualVM' like the 'VisualGC' plugin.

'jstatd' is the daemon that allows a 'jstat' connection to be established.

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM