简体   繁体   中英

Generic with a lower bounded wildcard <? super Dog>

class Animal{}
class Dog extends Animal{}
class Cat extends Animal{}
public class Mixer<A extends Animal>{
    public <C extends Cat> Mixer<? super Dog> useMe(A a, C c){
        //return new Mixer<Object>();//KO
        return new Mixer<Animal>(); //OK
    }
}

The return parameter is Mixer<? super Dog> Mixer<? super Dog> so if is a defined with a lower bounded wildcard

Why do I have a compiler error when I return a Mixer<Object> and there is no compiler error with Mixer<Animal> ?

The problem is not in the return type of your method, rather it is the Generic Type bound to your class Mixer .

Let's see what went wrong: -

public <C extends Cat> Mixer<? super Dog> useMe(A a, C c)

The return type Mixer<? super Dog> Mixer<? super Dog> means, you can return any Mixer of type Dog or a super-type of Dog, may be Animal .

    //return new Mixer<Object>();//KO
    return new Mixer<Animal>(); //OK

So, both the return statments would have worked fine , because, both Animal and Object is a super-type of Dog .

But , the reason why the first one does not fits in is because, you have declared your class as: -

public class Mixer<A extends Animal>

So, you have bound your type that can be associated with Mixer class to either Animal or its subtype . Now, since, Object is not a subtype of Animal , you can't just create: -

new Mixer<Object>();

So, you can create instances of your class like:-

new Mixer<Animal>(); // OR
new Mixer<Dog>();  // Dog extends Animal  // OR
new Mixer<Cat>();  // Cat extends Animal

// **** But NOT like this ******
new Mixer<Object>();  // Object does not extend Animal

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM