What's more efficient when delegating methods?

Question

I have a site full of AJAX so I need to delegate methods to document clicks, assuming I have jQuery library too.
I just want to know what's more efficient between these two codes:

$(document).on('click', '.delegate1', function(){
    doSomethingForDelegate1();
}).on('click', '.delegate2', function(){
    doSomethingForDelegate2();
});  

Or:

$(document).on('click', function(event){
    var element = $(event.target);
    if(element.hasClass('delegate1')){
        doSomethingForDelegate1();
    } else if(element.hasClass('delegate2')){
        doSomethingForDelegate2();
    }
})  

I want to implement the code that will have less impact on client's execution time and therefore have a faster site. I know that maybe the difference won't be much but it's always better to work faster ;)

If there's a method that's faster than these 2 methods it's welcome too. Thanks.

If the difference isn't noticeable enough then I want to know what algorythm is cleaner, binding an event for each delegate or bind a single event and compare classes.

Answer 1

The 2nd method can be efficient when there are many elements that are being added to the DOM at a later time. SO attaching a single event to the document and delegating can really speed up the application .

But if the number of elements created and needed to be attached are not huge, both should perform at the same rate..

I would go with the 1st approach as it is lot more cleaner.