繁体   English   中英

退订后,我如何等待一切按Rx可观察的顺序进行?

[英]How can I await that everything is done in a Rx observable sequence after unsubscribe?

介绍

在我的WPF C#.NET应用程序中,我使用反应性扩展(Rx)订阅事件,而且我经常不得不从数据库中重新加载某些内容以获取更新UI所需的值,因为事件对象通常仅包含ID和一些元数据。

我使用Rx调度在后台加载数据并更新调度程序上的UI。 我在Rx序列中混合“ Task.Run”时遇到了一些不好的经验(当使用“ SelectMany”时,将不再保证顺序,并且很难在UnitTests中控制调度)。 另请参阅: 在反应性管道中执行TPL代码并通过测试调度程序控制执行

我的问题

如果我关闭我的应用程序(或关闭选项卡),我想取消订阅,然后等待DB调用(从Rx“ Select”调用),该调用在“ subscription.Dispose”之后仍然可以运行。 到目前为止,我还没有找到任何好的工具或简便的方法来做到这一点。

问题

是否有任何框架支持来等待仍在Rx链中运行的所有内容

如果没有,您对如何制作易于使用的实用程序有什么好主意?

有没有其他好的方法可以达到相同的目的?

public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain()
{
    // In real life this is a hot observable event sequence which never completes
    IObservable<int> eventSource = Enumerable.Range(1, int.MaxValue).ToObservable();

    IDisposable subscription = eventSource
        // Load data in the background
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))

        // Update UI on the dispatcher
        .ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
        .SubscribeOn(Scheduler.Default) // In real life the source produces the event values on a background thread.
        .Subscribe(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData));

    Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
// In real life I want to cancel (unsubscribe) here because the user has closed the Application or closed the tab and return a task which completes when everything is done.

    // Unsubscribe just guarantees that no "OnNext" is called anymore, but it doesn't wait until all operations in the sequence are finished (for example "LoadFromDatabase(id)" can still be runnig here.
    subscription.Dispose();

    await ?; // I need to await here, so that i can be sure that no "LoadFromDatabase(id)" is running anymore.

    ShutDownDatabase();
}

我已经尝试过(但没有用)的内容

  • 使用“最终”运算符设置TaskCompletionSource的结果。 这种方法的问题:退订后最终直接被调用,并且“ LoadFromDatabase”仍然可以运行

更新:具有控制台输出和TakeUntil的示例

public async Task Main()
{
    Observable
        .Timer(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5.0))
        .Subscribe(x =>
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Cancel started");
            _shuttingDown.OnNext(Unit.Default);
        });

    await AwaitEverythingInARxChain();
    Console.WriteLine("Cancel finished");
    ShutDownDatabase();
    Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3));
}

private Subject<Unit> _shuttingDown = new Subject<Unit>();

public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain()
{
    IObservable<int> eventSource = Observable.Range(0, 10);

    await eventSource
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .TakeUntil(_shuttingDown)
        .Do(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData));
}

public int LoadFromDatabase(int x)
{
    Console.WriteLine("Start LoadFromDatabase: " + x);
    Thread.Sleep(1000);
    Console.WriteLine("Finished LoadFromDatabase: " + x);

    return x;
}

public void UpdateUi(int x)
{
    Console.WriteLine("UpdateUi: " + x);
}

public void ShutDownDatabase()
{
    Console.WriteLine("ShutDownDatabase");
}

输出(实际):

Start LoadFromDatabase: 0
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 0
Start LoadFromDatabase: 1
UpdateUi: 0
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 1
Start LoadFromDatabase: 2
UpdateUi: 1
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 2
Start LoadFromDatabase: 3
UpdateUi: 2
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 3
Start LoadFromDatabase: 4
UpdateUi: 3
Cancel started
Cancel finished
ShutDownDatabase
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 4
Start LoadFromDatabase: 5
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 5
Start LoadFromDatabase: 6
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 6
Start LoadFromDatabase: 7

预期:我想保证以下是最后的输出:

Cancel finished
ShutDownDatabase

这比您想象的要容易。 您可以await观察。 因此,只需执行以下操作:

public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain()
{
    IObservable<int> eventSource = Enumerable.Range(1, 10).ToObservable();

    await eventSource
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
        .ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
        .Do(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData), () => ShutDownDatabase());
}

在您的方法中使用Console.WriteLine操作,并在db调用中休眠一个小线程以模拟网络延迟,我得到以下输出:

LoadFromDatabase: 1
LoadFromDatabase: 2
UpdateUi: 1
LoadFromDatabase: 3
UpdateUi: 2
LoadFromDatabase: 4
UpdateUi: 3
LoadFromDatabase: 5
UpdateUi: 4
LoadFromDatabase: 6
UpdateUi: 5
LoadFromDatabase: 7
UpdateUi: 6
LoadFromDatabase: 8
UpdateUi: 7
LoadFromDatabase: 9
UpdateUi: 8
LoadFromDatabase: 10
UpdateUi: 9
UpdateUi: 10
ShutDownDatabase

如果需要结束查询,只需创建一个shuttingDown主题:

private Subject<Unit> _shuttingDown = new Subject<Unit>();

...然后像这样修改查询:

    await eventSource
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
        .ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
        .Do(
            loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData),
            () => ShutDownDatabase())
        .TakeUntil(_shuttingDown);

您只需要发出_shuttingDown.OnNext(Unit.Default); 取消订阅可观察者。


这是我完整的工作测试代码:

async Task Main()
{
    Observable
        .Timer(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5.0))
        .Subscribe(x => _shuttingDown.OnNext(Unit.Default));

    await AwaitEverythingInARxChain();
}

private Subject<Unit> _shuttingDown = new Subject<Unit>();

public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain()
{
    IObservable<int> eventSource = Observable.Range(0, 10);

    await eventSource
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
        .ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
        .Finally(() => ShutDownDatabase())
        .TakeUntil(_shuttingDown)
        .Do(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData));
}

public int LoadFromDatabase(int x)
{
    Console.WriteLine("LoadFromDatabase: " + x);
    Thread.Sleep(1000);
    return x;
}

public void UpdateUi(int x)
{
    Console.WriteLine("UpdateUi: " + x);
}

public void ShutDownDatabase()
{
    Console.WriteLine("ShutDownDatabase");
}

我得到以下输出:

LoadFromDatabase: 0
LoadFromDatabase: 1
UpdateUi: 0
LoadFromDatabase: 2
UpdateUi: 1
LoadFromDatabase: 3
UpdateUi: 2
LoadFromDatabase: 4
UpdateUi: 3
LoadFromDatabase: 5
UpdateUi: 4
ShutDownDatabase

请注意,可观察对象尝试在10秒内生成10个值,但是它被OnNext缩短了。

我终于找到了解决方案。 您可以使用TakeWhile实现它。 TakeUntil不起作用,因为当第二个可观察序列产生第一个值时,主要可观察序列立即完成。

这是工作解决方案的示例:

     public async Task Main_Solution()
    {
        CancellationTokenSource cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();

        Observable
            .Timer(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(4))
            .Subscribe(x =>
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Cancel startedthread='{0}'", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
                cancellationTokenSource.Cancel();
            });

        await AwaitEverythingInARxChain(cancellationTokenSource.Token);
        Console.WriteLine("Cancel finished thread='{0}'", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
        ShutDownDatabase();
        Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
    }

    public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain(CancellationToken token)
    {
        IObservable<int> eventSource = Observable.Range(0, 10);

        await eventSource
            .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
            .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
            .TakeWhile(_ => !token.IsCancellationRequested)
            .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default) // Dispatcher in real life
            .Do(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData)).LastOrDefaultAsync();
    }

    public int LoadFromDatabase(int x)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Start LoadFromDatabase: {0} thread='{1}'", x, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
        Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3));
        Console.WriteLine("Finished LoadFromDatabase: {0} thread='{1}'", x, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);

        return x;
    }

    public void UpdateUi(int x)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("UpdateUi: '{0}' thread='{1}'", x, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
    }

    public void ShutDownDatabase()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("ShutDownDatabase thread='{0}'", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
    }

并输出:

Start LoadFromDatabase: 0 thread='9'
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 0 thread='9'
Start LoadFromDatabase: 1 thread='9'
UpdateUi: '0' thread='10'
Cancel startedthread='4'
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 1 thread='9'
Cancel finished thread='10'
ShutDownDatabase thread='10'

请注意,“ ShutDownDatabase”是最后的输出(按预期)。 它等待直到“ LoadFromDatabase”完成第二个值,即使其产生的值未得到进一步处理也是如此。 这正是我想要的。

您需要等待一些事情。 您不能等待订阅处置。 最简单的方法是将您的处置逻辑变成可观察的一部分:

var observable = eventSource
    // Load data in the background
    .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
    .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
    .TakeUntil(Observable.Timer(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10))) //This replaces your Thread.Sleep call
    .Publish()
    .RefCount();

var subscription = observable.ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
    .Subscribe(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData));

//do whatever you want here.

await observable.LastOrDefault();

暂无
暂无

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM