簡體   English   中英

退訂后,我如何等待一切按Rx可觀察的順序進行?

[英]How can I await that everything is done in a Rx observable sequence after unsubscribe?

介紹

在我的WPF C#.NET應用程序中,我使用反應性擴展(Rx)訂閱事件,而且我經常不得不從數據庫中重新加載某些內容以獲取更新UI所需的值,因為事件對象通常僅包含ID和一些元數據。

我使用Rx調度在后台加載數據並更新調度程序上的UI。 我在Rx序列中混合“ Task.Run”時遇到了一些不好的經驗(當使用“ SelectMany”時,將不再保證順序,並且很難在UnitTests中控制調度)。 另請參閱: 在反應性管道中執行TPL代碼並通過測試調度程序控制執行

我的問題

如果我關閉我的應用程序(或關閉選項卡),我想取消訂閱,然后等待DB調用(從Rx“ Select”調用),該調用在“ subscription.Dispose”之后仍然可以運行。 到目前為止,我還沒有找到任何好的工具或簡便的方法來做到這一點。

問題

是否有任何框架支持來等待仍在Rx鏈中運行的所有內容

如果沒有,您對如何制作易於使用的實用程序有什么好主意?

有沒有其他好的方法可以達到相同的目的?

public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain()
{
    // In real life this is a hot observable event sequence which never completes
    IObservable<int> eventSource = Enumerable.Range(1, int.MaxValue).ToObservable();

    IDisposable subscription = eventSource
        // Load data in the background
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))

        // Update UI on the dispatcher
        .ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
        .SubscribeOn(Scheduler.Default) // In real life the source produces the event values on a background thread.
        .Subscribe(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData));

    Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
// In real life I want to cancel (unsubscribe) here because the user has closed the Application or closed the tab and return a task which completes when everything is done.

    // Unsubscribe just guarantees that no "OnNext" is called anymore, but it doesn't wait until all operations in the sequence are finished (for example "LoadFromDatabase(id)" can still be runnig here.
    subscription.Dispose();

    await ?; // I need to await here, so that i can be sure that no "LoadFromDatabase(id)" is running anymore.

    ShutDownDatabase();
}

我已經嘗試過(但沒有用)的內容

  • 使用“最終”運算符設置TaskCompletionSource的結果。 這種方法的問題:退訂后最終直接被調用,並且“ LoadFromDatabase”仍然可以運行

更新:具有控制台輸出和TakeUntil的示例

public async Task Main()
{
    Observable
        .Timer(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5.0))
        .Subscribe(x =>
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Cancel started");
            _shuttingDown.OnNext(Unit.Default);
        });

    await AwaitEverythingInARxChain();
    Console.WriteLine("Cancel finished");
    ShutDownDatabase();
    Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3));
}

private Subject<Unit> _shuttingDown = new Subject<Unit>();

public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain()
{
    IObservable<int> eventSource = Observable.Range(0, 10);

    await eventSource
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .TakeUntil(_shuttingDown)
        .Do(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData));
}

public int LoadFromDatabase(int x)
{
    Console.WriteLine("Start LoadFromDatabase: " + x);
    Thread.Sleep(1000);
    Console.WriteLine("Finished LoadFromDatabase: " + x);

    return x;
}

public void UpdateUi(int x)
{
    Console.WriteLine("UpdateUi: " + x);
}

public void ShutDownDatabase()
{
    Console.WriteLine("ShutDownDatabase");
}

輸出(實際):

Start LoadFromDatabase: 0
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 0
Start LoadFromDatabase: 1
UpdateUi: 0
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 1
Start LoadFromDatabase: 2
UpdateUi: 1
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 2
Start LoadFromDatabase: 3
UpdateUi: 2
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 3
Start LoadFromDatabase: 4
UpdateUi: 3
Cancel started
Cancel finished
ShutDownDatabase
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 4
Start LoadFromDatabase: 5
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 5
Start LoadFromDatabase: 6
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 6
Start LoadFromDatabase: 7

預期:我想保證以下是最后的輸出:

Cancel finished
ShutDownDatabase

這比您想象的要容易。 您可以await觀察。 因此,只需執行以下操作:

public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain()
{
    IObservable<int> eventSource = Enumerable.Range(1, 10).ToObservable();

    await eventSource
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
        .ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
        .Do(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData), () => ShutDownDatabase());
}

在您的方法中使用Console.WriteLine操作,並在db調用中休眠一個小線程以模擬網絡延遲,我得到以下輸出:

LoadFromDatabase: 1
LoadFromDatabase: 2
UpdateUi: 1
LoadFromDatabase: 3
UpdateUi: 2
LoadFromDatabase: 4
UpdateUi: 3
LoadFromDatabase: 5
UpdateUi: 4
LoadFromDatabase: 6
UpdateUi: 5
LoadFromDatabase: 7
UpdateUi: 6
LoadFromDatabase: 8
UpdateUi: 7
LoadFromDatabase: 9
UpdateUi: 8
LoadFromDatabase: 10
UpdateUi: 9
UpdateUi: 10
ShutDownDatabase

如果需要結束查詢,只需創建一個shuttingDown主題:

private Subject<Unit> _shuttingDown = new Subject<Unit>();

...然后像這樣修改查詢:

    await eventSource
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
        .ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
        .Do(
            loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData),
            () => ShutDownDatabase())
        .TakeUntil(_shuttingDown);

您只需要發出_shuttingDown.OnNext(Unit.Default); 取消訂閱可觀察者。


這是我完整的工作測試代碼:

async Task Main()
{
    Observable
        .Timer(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5.0))
        .Subscribe(x => _shuttingDown.OnNext(Unit.Default));

    await AwaitEverythingInARxChain();
}

private Subject<Unit> _shuttingDown = new Subject<Unit>();

public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain()
{
    IObservable<int> eventSource = Observable.Range(0, 10);

    await eventSource
        .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
        .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
        .ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
        .Finally(() => ShutDownDatabase())
        .TakeUntil(_shuttingDown)
        .Do(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData));
}

public int LoadFromDatabase(int x)
{
    Console.WriteLine("LoadFromDatabase: " + x);
    Thread.Sleep(1000);
    return x;
}

public void UpdateUi(int x)
{
    Console.WriteLine("UpdateUi: " + x);
}

public void ShutDownDatabase()
{
    Console.WriteLine("ShutDownDatabase");
}

我得到以下輸出:

LoadFromDatabase: 0
LoadFromDatabase: 1
UpdateUi: 0
LoadFromDatabase: 2
UpdateUi: 1
LoadFromDatabase: 3
UpdateUi: 2
LoadFromDatabase: 4
UpdateUi: 3
LoadFromDatabase: 5
UpdateUi: 4
ShutDownDatabase

請注意,可觀察對象嘗試在10秒內生成10個值,但是它被OnNext縮短了。

我終於找到了解決方案。 您可以使用TakeWhile實現它。 TakeUntil不起作用,因為當第二個可觀察序列產生第一個值時,主要可觀察序列立即完成。

這是工作解決方案的示例:

     public async Task Main_Solution()
    {
        CancellationTokenSource cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();

        Observable
            .Timer(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(4))
            .Subscribe(x =>
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Cancel startedthread='{0}'", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
                cancellationTokenSource.Cancel();
            });

        await AwaitEverythingInARxChain(cancellationTokenSource.Token);
        Console.WriteLine("Cancel finished thread='{0}'", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
        ShutDownDatabase();
        Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
    }

    public async Task AwaitEverythingInARxChain(CancellationToken token)
    {
        IObservable<int> eventSource = Observable.Range(0, 10);

        await eventSource
            .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
            .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
            .TakeWhile(_ => !token.IsCancellationRequested)
            .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default) // Dispatcher in real life
            .Do(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData)).LastOrDefaultAsync();
    }

    public int LoadFromDatabase(int x)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Start LoadFromDatabase: {0} thread='{1}'", x, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
        Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3));
        Console.WriteLine("Finished LoadFromDatabase: {0} thread='{1}'", x, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);

        return x;
    }

    public void UpdateUi(int x)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("UpdateUi: '{0}' thread='{1}'", x, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
    }

    public void ShutDownDatabase()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("ShutDownDatabase thread='{0}'", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
    }

並輸出:

Start LoadFromDatabase: 0 thread='9'
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 0 thread='9'
Start LoadFromDatabase: 1 thread='9'
UpdateUi: '0' thread='10'
Cancel startedthread='4'
Finished LoadFromDatabase: 1 thread='9'
Cancel finished thread='10'
ShutDownDatabase thread='10'

請注意,“ ShutDownDatabase”是最后的輸出(按預期)。 它等待直到“ LoadFromDatabase”完成第二個值,即使其產生的值未得到進一步處理也是如此。 這正是我想要的。

您需要等待一些事情。 您不能等待訂閱處置。 最簡單的方法是將您的處置邏輯變成可觀察的一部分:

var observable = eventSource
    // Load data in the background
    .ObserveOn(Scheduler.Default)
    .Select(id => LoadFromDatabase(id))
    .TakeUntil(Observable.Timer(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10))) //This replaces your Thread.Sleep call
    .Publish()
    .RefCount();

var subscription = observable.ObserveOn(DispatcherScheduler.Current)
    .Subscribe(loadedData => UpdateUi(loadedData));

//do whatever you want here.

await observable.LastOrDefault();

暫無
暫無

聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粵ICP備18138465號  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM