[英]foldr not returning with an infinite list
我已閱讀https://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Foldl_as_foldr和其他一些有關foldl和foldr之間差異的博客文章。 現在,我嘗試使用文件夾將斐波那契數列編寫為無限列表,並提出了以下解決方案:
fibs2 :: [Integer]
fibs2 = foldr buildFibs [] [1..]
where
buildFibs :: Integer -> [Integer] -> [Integer]
buildFibs _ [] = [0]
buildFibs _ [0] = [1,0]
buildFibs _ l@(x:s:z) = (x + s):l
但是當我take 3 fibs2
,該函數不會返回。 我認為文件夾遞歸可以在這些情況下與無限列表一起使用。 為什么這不適用於我的解決方案?
問自己:哪個斐波那契數字將是列表中的第一個? 我對您的代碼的理解是,該問題的答案是“最大的問題”(概念上,每次buildFibs
迭代buildFibs
在結果列表的buildFibs
添加一個稍大的數字)。 由於有無數斐波納契數,因此計算需要一段時間!
這是進行方程式推理的好方法:
fibs2 = foldr buildFibs [] [1..]
foldr f z [] = z
foldr f z (x:xs) = f x (foldr f z xs)
foldr buildFibs [] [1..] =
buildFibs 1 (foldr buildFibs [] [2..]) =
buildFibs 1 (buildFibs 2 (foldr buildFibs [] [3..])) =
buildFibs 1 (buildFibs 2 (buildFibs 3 (foldr buildFibs [] [4..]))) =
...
我希望現在您可以看到問題所在: foldr
在返回之前試圖遍歷整個列表。 如果我們改用foldl
會怎樣?
foldl f z [] = z
foldl f z (x:xs) = foldl f (f z x) xs
buildFibs' = flip buildFibs
foldl buildFibs' [] [1..] =
foldl buildFibs' (buildFibs 1 []) [2..] =
foldl buildFibs' [0] [2..] =
foldl buildFibs' (buildFibs 2 [0]) [3..] =
foldl buildFibs' [0,1] [3..] =
foldl buildFibs' (buildFibs 3 [0,1]) [4..] =
foldl buildFibs' (0+1 : [0,1]) [4..] =
foldl buildFibs' [1,0,1] [4..] =
foldl buildFibs' (buildFibs 4 [1,0,1]) [5..] =
foldl buildFibs' (1+0 : [1,0,1]) [5..] =
foldl buildFibs' [1,1,0,1] [5..] =
foldl buildFibs' (buildFibs 5 [1,1,0,1]) [6..] =
foldl buildFibs' [2,1,1,0,1] [6..] =
-- For brevity I'll speed up the substitution
foldl buildFibs' [3,2,1,1,0,1] [7..] =
foldl buildFibs' [5,3,2,1,1,0,1] [8..] =
foldl buildFibs' [8,5,3,2,1,1,0,1] [9..] =
...
因此,如您所見,您實際上可以使用buildFibs
和foldl
計算斐波那契數,但是不幸的是,您向后建立了一個無限的列表,您將永遠無法計算列表中的特定元素,因為foldl
永遠不會終止。 但是,您可以計算有限數量的它們:
> take 10 $ foldl buildFibs' [] [1..10]
[34,21,13,8,5,3,2,1,1,0]
聲明:本站的技術帖子網頁,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0協議,如果您需要轉載,請注明本站網址或者原文地址。任何問題請咨詢:yoyou2525@163.com.