慢速C ++ DirectX 2D游戏

Question

I'm new to C++ and DirectX, I come from XNA. I have developed a game like Fly The Copter . What i've done is created a class named Wall. While the game is running I draw all the walls. In XNA I stored the walls in a ArrayList and in C++ I've used vector. In XNA the game just runs fast and in C++ really slow. Here's the C++ code:

void GameScreen::Update()
{
    //Update Walls
    int len = walls.size();
    for(int i = wallsPassed; i < len; i++)
    {
        walls.at(i).Update();
        if (walls.at(i).pos.x <= -40)
            wallsPassed += 2;
    }
}

void GameScreen::Draw()
{
    //Draw Walls
    int len = walls.size();
    for(int i = wallsPassed; i < len; i++)
    {
        if (walls.at(i).pos.x < 1280)
            walls.at(i).Draw();
        else
            break;
    }
}

In the Update method I decrease the X value by 4. In the Draw method I call sprite->Draw (Direct3DXSprite). That the only codes that runs in the game loop. I know this is a bad code, if you have an idea to improve it please help. Thanks and sorry about my english.

Answer 1

Try replacing all occurrences of at() with the [] operator. For example:

 walls[i].Draw();

and then turn on all optimisations. Both [] and at() are function calls - to get the maximum performance you need to make sure that they are inlined, which is what upping the optimisation level will do.

You can also do some minimal caching of a wall object - for example:

 for(int i = wallsPassed; i < len; i++)
 {
    Wall & w = walls[i]; 
    w.Update();
    if (w.pos.x <= -40)
        wallsPassed += 2;
 }

Answer 2

Try to narrow the cause of the performance problem (also termed profiling). I would try drawing only one object while continue updating all the objects. If its suddenly faster, then its a DirectX drawing problem.

Otherwise try drawing all the objects, but updating only one wall. If its faster then your update() function may be too expensive.

Answer 3

• How fast is 'fast'?
• How slow is'really slow'?
• How many sprites are you drawing?
• How big is each one as an image file, and in pixels drawn on-screen?
• How does performance scale (in XNA/C++) as you change the number of sprites drawn?
• What difference do you get if you draw without updating, or vice versa

Answer 4

Maybe you just have forgotten to turn on release mode :) I had some problems with it in the past - I thought my code was very slow because of debug mode. If it's not it, you can have a problem with rendering part, or with huge count of objects. The code you provided looks good...

Answer 5

Have you tried multiple buffers (aka Double Buffering ) for the bitmaps?

The typical scenario is to draw in one buffer, then while the first buffer is copied to the screen, draw in a second buffer.

Another technique is to have a huge "logical" screen in memory. The portion draw in the physical display is a viewport or view into a small area in the logical screen. Moving the background (or screen) just requires a copy on the part of the graphics processor.

Answer 6

You can aid batching of sprite draw calls. Presumably Your draw call calls your only instance of ID3DXSprite::Draw with the relevant parameters.

You can get much improved performance by doing a call to ID3DXSprite::Begin (with the D3DXSPRITE_SORT_TEXTURE flag set) and then calling ID3DXSprite::End when you've done all your rendering. ID3DXSprite will then sort all your sprite calls by texture to decrease the number of texture switches and batch the relevant calls together. This will improve performance massively.

Its difficult to say more, however, without seeing the internals of your Update and Draw calls. The above is only a guess ...

Answer 7

To draw every single wall with a different draw call is a bad idea. Try to batch the data into a single vertex buffer/index buffer and send them into a single draw. That's a more sane idea.

Anyway for getting an idea of WHY it goes slowly try with some CPU and GPU (PerfHud, Intel GPA, etc...) to know first of all WHAT's the bottleneck (if the CPU or the GPU). And then you can fight to alleviate the problem.

Answer 8

The lookups into your list of walls are unlikely to be the source of your slowdown. The cost of drawing objects in 3D will typically be the limiting factor.

The important parts are your draw code, the flags you used to create the DirectX device, and the flags you use to create your textures. My stab in the dark... check that you initialize the device as HAL (hardware 3d) rather than REF (software 3d).

Also, how many sprites are you drawing? Each draw call has a fair amount of overhead. If you make more than couple-hundred per frame, that will be your limiting factor.