用于纹理上传的OpenGL PBO，无法理解一件事

Question

Okay , I read everything about PBO here : http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Pixel_Buffer_Object and there http://www.songho.ca/opengl/gl_pbo.html , but I still have a question and I don't know if I'll get any benefit out of a PBO in my case :

I'm doing video-streaming,currently I have a function copying my data buffers to 3 different textures, and then I'm doing some maths in a fragment shader and I display the texture.

I thought PBO could increase the upload time CPU -> GPU, but here it is, let's say we have this example here taken from the second link above.

glBindBufferARB(GL_PIXEL_UNPACK_BUFFER_ARB, pboIds[nextIndex]);

        // map the buffer object into client's memory
        // Note that glMapBufferARB() causes sync issue.
        // If GPU is working with this buffer, glMapBufferARB() will wait(stall)
        // for GPU to finish its job. To avoid waiting (stall), you can call
        // first glBufferDataARB() with NULL pointer before glMapBufferARB().
        // If you do that, the previous data in PBO will be discarded and
        // glMapBufferARB() returns a new allocated pointer immediately
        // even if GPU is still working with the previous data.
        glBufferDataARB(GL_PIXEL_UNPACK_BUFFER_ARB, DATA_SIZE, 0, GL_STREAM_DRAW_ARB);
        GLubyte* ptr = (GLubyte*)glMapBufferARB(GL_PIXEL_UNPACK_BUFFER_ARB, GL_WRITE_ONLY_ARB);
        if(ptr)
        {
            // update data directly on the mapped buffer
            updatePixels(ptr, DATA_SIZE);
            glUnmapBufferARB(GL_PIXEL_UNPACK_BUFFER_ARB); // release pointer to mapping buffer
        }

        // measure the time modifying the mapped buffer
        t1.stop();
        updateTime = t1.getElapsedTimeInMilliSec();
        ///////////////////////////////////////////////////

        // it is good idea to release PBOs with ID 0 after use.
        // Once bound with 0, all pixel operations behave normal ways.
        glBindBufferARB(GL_PIXEL_UNPACK_BUFFER_ARB, 0);

Well, whatever is the behavior of the updatePixels function , it is still using CPU cycles to copy the data to the mapped buffer isn't it?

So let's say I wanted to use PBO in such a manner, that is, to update my frame pixels to the PBO in a function , and then in the display function to call glTexSubImage2D (which should return immediately)... Would I see any speed-up in term of performance? I can't see why it would be faster... okay we're not waiting anymore during the glTex* call, but we're waiting during the function that uploads the frame to the PBO, aren't we?

Could someone clear that out for me please?

Thanks

Answer 1

The point about Buffer Objects is, that they can be use asynchronously. You can map a BO and then have some other part of the program update it (think threads, think asynchronous IO) while you can keep issuing OpenGL commands. A typical usage scenario with triple buffered PBOs may look like this:

wait_for_video_frame_load_complete(buffer[k-2])

glUnmapBuffer buffer[k-2]

glTexSubImage2D from buffer[k-2]

buffer[k] = glMapBuffer

start_load_next_video_frame(buffer[k]);

draw_texture

SwapBuffers

This allows your program to do usefull work and even upload data to OpenGL while its also used for rendering