Okay so I have a method that needs to take in an array full of ints
, then check it against it's mirror to see what the largest mirror is that it matches to. So for example I have array [7, 1, 2, 9, 7, 2, 1]
, the largest array that it can match is 2, being matched at [1, 2]
.
Right now I have it broken into 3 methods. One that accepts the array, another that reverses the array and returns it ( mirrorArray
). and the 3rd being counting the size of the array that matches( groupCount
). Here is what I have so far:
public int maxMirror(int[] nums) {
int[] revArray = mirrorArray(nums);
return groupCount(nums, revArray);
}
private int[] mirrorArray(int[] nums) {
int[] newArray = new int[nums.length];
for (int i = nums.length-1, j = 0; i >= 0; i--, j++) {
newArray[j] = nums[i];
}
return newArray;
}
private int groupCount(int[] aFor, int[] bRev) {
int maxCount = 0;
int groupSize = 1;
//get aFor value
for (int i = 0; i < aFor.length; i++) {
int[] tempA = Arrays.copyOfRange(aFor, 0, groupSize);
//loop through bRev and check for matches
for (int j = 0; j < bRev.length; j++) {
int[] tempB = Arrays.copyOfRange(bRev, j, j+groupSize);
if (Arrays.equals(tempA, tempB)) {
maxCount = tempA.length;
}
}
groupSize++;
}
return maxCount;
}
It is failing in the 3rd method somewhere (returning a 1 instead of a 2) and I'm stumped why the loops I have arnt returning what I want. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Alright I was curious...
Here's the problem:
int[] tempA = Arrays.copyOfRange(aFor, 0, groupSize);
You are always comparing tempB to the first subArray of length groupSize
of aFor. Change that line to
int[] tempA = Arrays.copyOfRange(aFor, i, i + groupSize);
and it should work.
EDIT Keep the failure cases coming.. Seems an issue with the increment location of groupSize
while (groupSize < aFor.length) {
//get aFor value
for (int i = 0; i < aFor.length; i++) {
int[] tempA = Arrays.copyOfRange(aFor, i, i + groupSize);
//loop through bRev and check for matches
for (int j = 0; j < bRev.length; j++) {
int[] tempB = Arrays.copyOfRange(bRev, j, j+groupSize);
if (Arrays.equals(tempA, tempB)) {
maxCount = groupSize;
}
}
}
groupSize++;
}
This is not the most efficient, and it might be a fun exercise to optimize. One starting approach would be to start groupSize at aFor.length
and decrement. As soon as maxCount
is assigned, you can early return.
Edit 2
int groupSize = aFor.length;
while (groupSize >= 0) {
//get aFor value
for (int i = 0; i <= aFor.length - groupSize; i++) { // note this change
int[] tempA = Arrays.copyOfRange(aFor, i, i + groupSize);
//loop through bRev and check for matches
for (int j = 0; j <= bRev.length - groupSize; j++) { // note this change
int[] tempB = Arrays.copyOfRange(bRev, j, j+groupSize);
if (Arrays.equals(tempA, tempB)) {
return groupSize;
}
}
}
groupSize--;
}
return 1;
}
What was happening is that Arrays.copyOfRange was filling out of bounds numbers with zeroes. I also added the early exit opt I mentioned earlier. There are probably more optimizations that can be done
Your logic between tempA
and tempB
has issue:
In each iteration of first loop (orignal) you pick 0->groupSize set of values and compare exactly with all similar sizes sequence in reverse array, so first iteration is
Orignal array (aFor) : [7, 1, 2, 9, 7, 2, 1]
Reverse array (bRev) : [1, 2, 7, 9, 2, 1, 7]
Iteration-1:
tempA=> [7]
tempB=> [1],[2],[7]...
maxCount = 1; (in first iteration, multiple single value matche)
Iteration-2:
tempA=> [7,1]
tempB=> [1,2],[2,7]...
maxCount = 1; (no match of [7,1], maxCount continues from first iteration)
Similarly in all other iteration no sequence match would be found due to your input dataset.
Now if you change your input to [7, 1, 2, 9, 7, 1, 7], maxCount would be 2
And for input [7, 1, 2, 9, 2, 1, 7], maxCount is 7
But that's due to nature of your input and issue in your code.
The problem in code is outer loop ( aFor
loop) doesn't gets evaluated for each sequence set ie in iteration-2 you check only first set of size 2 ([7,1]) and further sets ([1,2],[2,9]..) are never compared so you always get maxCount=1 due to previous match.
I know that this might seem irrelevant to the question, but I tried to make the tests without creating new arrays (inplace comparaison), I hope this helps:
public static int getMaxMirrorSub(int[] arr) {
for (int eqLength = arr.length; eqLength >= 0; eqLength--) {
for (int arrayStart = 0; arrayStart < arr.length; arrayStart++) {
for (int mirrorStart = arr.length - 1; mirrorStart >= eqLength - 1; mirrorStart--) {
int indexArray = arrayStart, indexMirror = mirrorStart;
while(indexArray < arr.length
&& indexMirror >= 0
&& arr[indexArray] == arr[indexMirror]){
indexArray++; indexMirror--;
}
if (indexArray - arrayStart == eqLength)
return eqLength;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
public int maxMirror(int[] nums) {
int[] reverse = null;
int max = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
for(int k = 0; k < nums.length; k++) {
if(i > k) {
} else {
reverse = reverseSection(nums, i, k);
if(searchFor(reverse, nums)) {
if(reverse.length > max) { max = reverse.length; }
}
}
}
}
return max;
}
public int[] reverseSection(int[] nums, int begin, int end) {
int[] nArray = new int[end - begin + 1];
int numbs = end - begin;
for(int i = begin; i <= end; i++) {
nArray[numbs] = nums[i];
numbs--;
}
return nArray;
}
public boolean searchFor(int[] reverse, int[] nums) {
int index = 0;
boolean check = false;
for(int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if(nums[i] == reverse[index]) {
index++;
if(index >= reverse.length) {
return true;
}
} else {
index = 0;
}
}
return false;
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.