简体   繁体   中英

Memberspaces may access private members of parent class

I've been reading this article , and was playing around with the memberspace idiom for a while when I noticed something that surprised me within this snippet (which compiles without problems: http://ideone.com/hRiV5B ):

class HugeClass
{
    public:
        struct memberspace
        {
            int f() const { return parent.f; }

            private:
                friend HugeClass;
                explicit memberspace(HugeClass & parent)
                : parent(parent) {}
                HugeClass & parent;
        } memberspace;

        HugeClass() : memberspace(*this), f(42) {}

    private:
        int f;
};

I would have expected a compiler error that the access of HugeClass::f is not allowed because f is private in that context.

HugeClass is a friend of memberspace , so HugeClass may call the private constructor of memberspace , but why does it work the other way around without explicitly declaring memberspace a friend of HugeClass ?

By language rules in C++11.

A nested class is a member and as such has the same access rights as any other member. Example:

 class E { int x; class B { }; class I { B b; // OK: E::I can access E::B void f(E* p, int i) { p->x = i; // OK: E::I can access E::x } }; }; 

And in C++03 was

The members of a nested class have no special access to members of an enclosing class, nor to classes or functions that have granted friendship to an enclosing class; the usual access rules (clause 11) shall be obeyed.

So, example from C++11 should not work with c++03 compilers.

memberspaceHugeClass一部分,与其他类成员具有相同的访问权限。

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM