这是仅不使用this.XYZ构造的简单情况吗?
It's only considered poor style if it violates your style guidelines. Sometimes using this
is necessary to qualify a member variable over a local variable:
public MyType(int arg)
{
this.arg = arg;
}
This problem can also be mitigated with style guidelines. For example, prefix members with "_":
public MyType(int arg)
{
_arg = arg;
}
I wouldn't say it's poor style - but it's not particularly idiomatic.
My almost sole use of this.foo
is when copying parameters into fields:
public Person (string name, string occupation)
{
this.name = name;
this.occupation = occupation;
}
I've never heard of it being a style issue. I used to do it all the time to get intellisense, but then I started using ctrl-j, then I just found myself remembering my object's properties without having to use a crutch.
Probably because my objects have become less complex as I gain more experience...
I always use this. for global variable. This way, I can clearly know that I am using a global variable without having to use prefix like "_".
MS工具StyleCop在分析源代码时坚持使用this.XYZ(或应为this.Xyz)变体。
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.