简体   繁体   中英

The getAndIncrement implementation of AtomicInteger

The getAndIncrement implementation of AtomicInteger does the following:

public final int getAndIncrement() {
    for (;;) {
        int current = get(); // Step 1 , get returns the volatile variable
        int next = current + 1;
        if (compareAndSet(current, next))
            return current;
    } }

Isn't it an equivalent of aVolatileVariable++? (which we know is not a correct usage). Without synchronization, how are we ensuring that this complete operation is atomic? What if the value of the volatile variable changes after the variable 'current' is read in Step 1?

The "secret sauce" is in this call:

compareAndSet(current, next)

The compareAndSet operation is going to fail (and return false ) if the original volatile value has been changed concurrently after the read, forcing the code to continue with the loop.

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM